Response to the Letter to the Editor: Prospective comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, whole-body MRI and CT in primary nodal staging of unfavourable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

Author(s):  
Simona Malaspina ◽  
Mikael Anttinen ◽  
Pekka Taimen ◽  
Eliisa Löyttyniemi ◽  
Jukka Kemppainen ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Simona Malaspina ◽  
Mikael Anttinen ◽  
Pekka Taimen ◽  
Ivan Jambor ◽  
Minna Sandell ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To prospectively compare 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and standard computed tomography (CT), in primary nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Men with newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa prospectively underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, WBMRI with DWI and contrast-enhanced CT within a median of 8 days. Six readers (two for each modality) independently reported pelvic lymph nodes as malignant, equivocal or benign while blinded to the other imaging modalities. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were reported according to optimistic (equivocal lesions interpreted as benign) and pessimistic (equivocal lesions interpreted as malignant) analyses. The reference standard diagnosis was based on multidisciplinary consensus meetings where available histopathology, clinical and follow-up data were used. Results Seventy-nine patients completed all the imaging modalities, except for one case of interrupted WBMRI. Thirty-one (39%) patients had pelvic lymph node metastases, which were detected in 27/31 (87%), 14/31 (45%) and 8/31 (26%) patients by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, WBMRI with DWI and CT, respectively (optimistic analysis). In 8/31 (26%) patients, only 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detected malignant lymph nodes, while the other two imaging modalities were reported as negative. At the patient level, sensitivity and specificity values for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, WBMRI with DWI and CT in optimistic analysis were 0.87 (95%CI 0.71–0.95) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.89–1.00), 0.37 (95%CI 0.22–0.55) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.89–1.00) and 0.26 (95%CI 0.14–0.43) and 1.00 (95%CI 0.93–1.00), respectively. Conclusion 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed significantly greater sensitivity in nodal staging of primary PCa than did WBMRI with DWI or CT, while maintaining high specificity. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03537391


2018 ◽  
Vol 210 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ur Metser ◽  
Alejandro Berlin ◽  
Jaydeep Halankar ◽  
Grainne Murphy ◽  
Kartik S. Jhaveri ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 6475-6480 ◽  
Author(s):  
SARA STRANDBERG ◽  
CAMILLA THELLENBERG KARLSSON ◽  
MATTIAS OGREN ◽  
JAN AXELSSON ◽  
KATRINE RIKLUND

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Y. Benameur ◽  
O. Ait Sahel ◽  
S. Nabih Oueriagli ◽  
J. El Bekkali ◽  
A. Doudouh

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 892-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline B. Mattiolli ◽  
Allan Santos ◽  
Andreia Vicente ◽  
Marcelo Queiroz ◽  
Diogo Bastos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimmi Bjöersdorff ◽  
Christopher Puterman ◽  
Jenny Oddstig ◽  
Jennifer Amidi ◽  
Sophia Zackrisson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can be used to detect and stage metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Improvements to hardware, such as digital technology, and to software, such as reconstruction algorithms, have recently been made. We compared the capability of detecting regional lymph node metastases using conventional and digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET-CT technology for [18F]-fluorocholine (FCH). Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology was used as the reference method.Methods: Retrospectively, a consecutive series of patients with prostate cancer who had undergone staging with FCH PET-CT before ePLND were included. Images were obtained with either a conventional or a SiPM-based PET-CT and compared. FCH uptake in pelvic lymph nodes beyond the uptake in the mediastinal blood pool was considered to be abnormal.Results: One hundred eighty patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were examined using a conventional Philips Gemini PET-CT (n = 93) between 2015 and 2017 or a digital GE Discovery MI PET-CT (n = 87) from 2017 to 2018. Images that were obtained using the Philips Gemini PET-CT system showed 19 patients (20%) with suspected lymph node metastases compared with 40 patients (46%) using the GE Discovery MI PET-CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were 0.30, 0.84, 0.47, and 0.72, respectively, for the Philips Gemini and 0.60, 0.58, 0.30, and 0.83, respectively for GE Discovery MI. Area under the curve (AUC) in a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was similar between the two PET-CT systems (0.58 and 0.58, P = 0.8).Conclusions: A marked difference in sensitivity and specificity was found for the different PET-CT systems, although similar overall diagnostic performance. This is probably due to differences in both hard- and software, including reconstruction algorithms, and should be considered when new technology is introduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document