scholarly journals Correction to: FDG-PET/CT in colorectal cancer: potential for vascular-metabolic imaging to provide markers of prognosis

Author(s):  
Shih-Hsin Chen ◽  
Kenneth Miles ◽  
Stuart A. Taylor ◽  
Balaji Ganeshan ◽  
Manuel Rodriquez ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang-Wen Chen ◽  
Wei-Chih Shen ◽  
William Tzu-Liang Chen ◽  
Te-Chun Hsieh ◽  
Kuo-Yang Yen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shih-hsin Chen ◽  
Kenneth Miles ◽  
Stuart A. Taylor ◽  
Balaji Ganeshan ◽  
Manuel Rodriquez ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study assesses the potential for vascular-metabolic imaging with FluoroDeoxyGlucose (FDG)–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) perfusion to provide markers of prognosis specific to the site and stage of colorectal cancer. Methods This prospective observational study comprised of participants with suspected colorectal cancer categorized as either (a) non-metastatic colon cancer (M0colon), (b) non-metastatic rectal cancer (M0rectum), or (c) metastatic colorectal cancer (M+). Combined FDG-PET/CT perfusion imaging was successfully performed in 286 participants (184 males, 102 females, age: 69.60 ± 10 years) deriving vascular and metabolic imaging parameters. Vascular and metabolic imaging parameters alone and in combination were investigated with respect to overall survival. Results A vascular-metabolic signature that was significantly associated with poorer survival was identified for each patient group: M0colon – high Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) with increased Permeability Surface Area Product/Blood Flow (PS/BF), Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.472 (95% CI: 1.441–8.333), p = 0.006; M0rectum – high Metabolic Tumour Volume (MTV) with increased PS/BF, HR 4.567 (95% CI: 1.901–10.970), p = 0.001; M+ participants, high MTV with longer Time To Peak (TTP) enhancement, HR 2.421 (95% CI: 1.162–5.045), p = 0.018. In participants with stage 2 colon cancer as well as those with stage 3 rectal cancer, the vascular-metabolic signature could stratify the prognosis of these participants. Conclusion Vascular and metabolic imaging using FDG-PET/CT can be used to synergise prognostic markers. The hazard ratios suggest that the technique may have clinical utility.


2012 ◽  
Vol 199 (5) ◽  
pp. 1003-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky Goh ◽  
Manu Shastry ◽  
Alec Engledow ◽  
Robert Kozarski ◽  
Jacqui Peck ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
pp. 249-254
Author(s):  
Maria V. Mattoli ◽  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Lucia Leccisotti ◽  
Alessandro Giordano

Introduction: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) plays a key role in oncology, and it is now being used increasingly to diagnose, characterize, and monitor disease activity in inflammatory disorders, including vasculitis. Unfortunately, its role in the management of vasculitis is still not well-defined, and clinicians are often unsure how this metabolic imaging technique should be used in these diseases, although its usefulness in diagnosing large-vessel vasculitis has been clearly demonstrated. Materials and methods: We reviewed the literature about the use of PET/CT in the management of vasculitis in an attempt to identify the applications and the limitations of this technique in clinical practice. Results and discussion: Our literature review revealed that 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful tool for diagnosing vasculitis (especially when the symptoms of the disease are non-specific); guiding biopsy procedures (areas with high glucose consumption); evaluating disease extension; and monitoring treatment responses. The main limitations of this method are the relatively low spatial resolution of the tomograph, which can lead to false-negative results in the presence of small-vessel vasculitis, and risk of false positive results, especially those related to the presence of atherosclerosis and to post-treatment vascular remodeling.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB345
Author(s):  
Si Hyung Lee ◽  
Kyeong Ok Kim ◽  
Byung-Ik Jang ◽  
Tae Nyeun Kim ◽  
Seongwoo Jeon ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (12) ◽  
pp. 1167-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.H. Briggs ◽  
F.U. Chowdhury ◽  
J.P.A. Lodge ◽  
A.F. Scarsbrook

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1094-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Makis ◽  
David Kurzencwyg ◽  
Marc Hickeson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document