Comparison of clinical efficacy, subjective user experience, and safety for two different core biopsy needles, the Achieve® and Marquee®

Author(s):  
Lisa M. Ho ◽  
Avani A. Pendse ◽  
James Ronald ◽  
Hemant Desai ◽  
Rui Dai ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 749-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wimmer ◽  
Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli ◽  
Mikhail Silk ◽  
Sebastien Monette ◽  
Narendra Gutta ◽  
...  

Objectives: To test the feasibility of modified biopsy needles as probes for irreversible electroporation ablation and periprocedural biopsy. Methods: Core biopsy needles of 16-G/9-cm were customized to serve as experimental ablation probes. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation was performed in in vivo porcine kidneys with pairs of experimental (n = 10) or standard probes (n = 10) using a single parameter set (1667 V/cm, ninety 100 µs pulses). Two biopsy samples were taken immediately following ablation using the experimental probes (n = 20). Ablation outcomes were compared using computed tomography, simulation, and histology. Biopsy and necropsy histology were compared. Results: Simulation-suggested ablations with experimental probes were smaller than that with standard electrodes (455.23 vs 543.16 mm2), although both exhibited similar shape. Computed tomography (standard: 556 ± 61 mm2, experimental: 515 ± 67 mm2; P = .25) and histology (standard: 313 ± 77 mm2, experimental: 275 ± 75 mm2; P = .29) indicated ablations with experimental probes were not significantly different from the standard. Histopathology indicated similar morphological changes in both groups. Biopsies from the ablation zone yielded at least 1 core with sufficient tissue for analysis (11 of the 20). Conclusions: A combined probe for irreversible electroporation ablation and periprocedural tissue sampling from the ablation zone is feasible. Ablation outcomes are comparable to those of standard electrodes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2133-2142
Author(s):  
Per Thunswärd ◽  
Anders Nilsson ◽  
Håkan Ahlström

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sai Lai Sey ◽  
Mohammad Al-Haddad ◽  
Thomas F. Imperiale ◽  
Kathleen McGreevy ◽  
Jingmei Lin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB545
Author(s):  
Se Woo Park ◽  
Moon Jae Chung ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
Seung Woo Park ◽  
SI. Young Song ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (05) ◽  
pp. E471-E478 ◽  
Author(s):  
John DeWitt ◽  
Chang-Min Cho ◽  
Jingmei Lin ◽  
Mohammad Al-Haddad ◽  
Marcia Canto ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. AB110 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Dewitt ◽  
Jinmei Lin ◽  
Mohammad a. AL-Haddad ◽  
Marcia I. Canto ◽  
Ashley Salamone ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 854-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Petrone ◽  
Jan‐Werner Poley ◽  
Matteo Bonzini ◽  
Ihab Abdulkader ◽  
Katharina Biermann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB454-AB455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Zator ◽  
Hongfa Zhu ◽  
Min Cui ◽  
Nikhil A. Kumta ◽  
Satish Nagula ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 898-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Antonini ◽  
Lorenzo Fuccio ◽  
Sara Giorgini ◽  
Carlo Fabbri ◽  
Leonardo Frazzoni ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 5845-5851
Author(s):  
DAANISH A. SIDDIQUE ◽  
MAHMOUD A. RAHAL ◽  
KAREN TREVINO ◽  
HOWARD H. WU ◽  
MOHAMMAD A. Al-HADDAD

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document