Honey bee waggle dance communication: signal meaning and signal noise affect dance follower behaviour

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Al Toufailia ◽  
Margaret J. Couvillon ◽  
Francis L. W. Ratnieks ◽  
Christoph Grüter
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 3602-3611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Nürnberger ◽  
Alexander Keller ◽  
Stephan Härtel ◽  
Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter

Insects ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randolf Menzel

The notion of the waggle dance simulating a flight towards a goal in a walking pattern has been proposed in the context of evolutionary considerations. Behavioral components, like its arousing effect on the social community, the attention of hive mates induced by this behavior, the direction of the waggle run relative to the sun azimuth or to gravity, as well as the number of waggles per run, have been tentatively related to peculiar behavioral patterns in both solitary and social insect species and are thought to reflect phylogenetic pre-adaptations. Here, I ask whether these thoughts can be substantiated from a functional perspective. Communication in the waggle dance is a group phenomenon involving the dancer and the followers that perform partially overlapping movements encoding and decoding the message respectively. It is thus assumed that the dancer and follower perform close cognitive processes. This provides us with access to these cognitive processes during dance communication because the follower can be tested in its flight performance when it becomes a recruit. I argue that the dance message and the landscape experience are processed in the same navigational memory, allowing the bee to fly novel direct routes, a property understood as an indication of a cognitive map.


1998 ◽  
Vol 01 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 267-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Anderson

Honey bee nectar foragers returning to the hive experience a delay as they search for a receiver bee to whom they transfer their material. In this paper I describe the simulation of the "threshold rule" (Seeley, 1995) which relates the magnitude of this search delay to the probability of performing a recriutment dance — waggle dance, tremble dance, or no dance. Results show that this rule leads to self-organised near-optimal worker allocation in a fluctuating environment, is extremely robust, and operates over a wide range of parameter values. The reason for the robustness appears to be the particular sytem of feedbacks that operate within the system.


Ethology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (12) ◽  
pp. 974-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylwia Łopuch ◽  
Adam Tofilski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document