Honey bee foragers balance colony nutritional deficiencies

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harmen P. Hendriksma ◽  
Sharoni Shafir
2014 ◽  
pp. 67-86
Author(s):  
Mary R. Myerscough ◽  
James R. Edwards ◽  
Timothy M. Schaerf
Keyword(s):  

Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 260 ◽  
pp. 127542
Author(s):  
Karl Fent ◽  
Tiffany Haltiner ◽  
Petra Kunz ◽  
Verena Christen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel A. Giannoni-Guzmán ◽  
Emmanuel Rivera ◽  
Janpierre Aleman-Rios ◽  
Alexander M. Melendez Moreno ◽  
Melina Perez Ramos ◽  
...  

AbstractHoney bees utilize their circadian rhythms to accurately predict the time of day. This ability allows foragers to remember the specific timing of food availability and its location for several days. Previous studies have provided strong evidence toward light/dark cycles being the primary Zeitgeber for honey bees. Recent work in our laboratory described large individual variation in the endogenous period length of honey bee foragers from the same colony and differences in the endogenous rhythms under different constant temperatures. In this study, we further this work by examining temperature inside the honey bee colony. By placing temperature and light data loggers at different locations inside the colony we uncovered that temperature oscillates with a 24-hour period at the periphery of the colony. We then simulated this temperature oscillation in the laboratory and found that using the temperature cycle as a Zeitgeber, foragers present large individual differences in the phase of locomotor rhythms with respect to temperature. Moreover, foragers successfully entrain to these simulated temperature cycles and advancing the cycle by six hours, resulted in changes in the phase of locomotor activity for the most foragers in the assay. The results shown in this study highlight the importance of temperature as a potential Zeitgeber in the field. Future studies will examine the possible functional and evolutionary role of the observed phase differences of circadian rhythms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisol Amaya-Márquez ◽  
Charles I. Abramson ◽  
Harrington Wells

2016 ◽  
Vol 219 (9) ◽  
pp. 1287-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Schürch ◽  
Francis L. W. Ratnieks ◽  
Elizabeth E. W. Samuelson ◽  
Margaret J. Couvillon
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-645
Author(s):  
Claude Dufour ◽  
Valérie Fournier ◽  
Pierre Giovenazzo

AbstractThe growth of the commercial pollination industry raises important concerns regarding honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus; Hymenoptera: Apidae) health and development. While providing such services, honey bees are often exposed to undiversified pollen sources that may contribute to nutritional deficiencies, notably in protein and amino acids. To understand how honey bees are affected during provision of pollination services, we compared honey bee colonies that pollinated lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton; Ericaceae) and/or cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton; Ericaceae) crops (management strategies) with control colonies in a diversified farmland environment. We identified the floral species of pollen collected by honey bee colonies in those crops compared to pollen collected by control colonies. We also analysed the protein and essential amino acid content of collected pollen and bee bread and measured the nutritional impact of pollination services on honey bee colonies. We found that honey bees providing blueberry and/or cranberry pollination services are exposed to a less diversified pollen diet than colonies located in a farmland environment, especially in a cranberry field. There was a significantly lower proportion of crude protein content in collected and stored pollen during provision of blueberry pollination services, which led to a smaller brood population. Many nutritional deficiencies were measured with regards to essential amino acids.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document