Water allocation under deficit irrigation using MIKE BASIN model for the mitigation of climate change

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 469-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charalampos Doulgeris ◽  
Pantazis Georgiou ◽  
Dimitris Papadimos ◽  
Dimitris Papamichail
Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Sordo-Ward ◽  
Alfredo Granados ◽  
Ana Iglesias ◽  
Luis Garrote ◽  
María Bejarano

We evaluated different management alternatives to enhance potential water availability for agriculture under climate change scenarios. The management goal involved maximizing potential water availability, understood as the maximum volume of water supplied at a certain point of the river network that satisfies a defined demand, and taking into account specified reliability requirements. We focused on potential water availability for agriculture and assumed two types of demands: urban supply and irrigation. If potential water availability was not enough to satisfy all irrigation demands, management measures were applied aiming at achieving a compromise solution between resources and demands. The methodological approach consisted of estimation and comparison of runoff for current and future period under climate change effects, calculation of water availability changes due to changes in runoff, and evaluation of the adaptation choices that can modify the distribution of water availability, under climate change. Adaptation choices include modifying water allocation to agriculture, increasing the reservoir storage capacity, improving the efficiency of urban water use, and modifying water allocation to environmental flows. These management measures were evaluated at the desired points of the river network by applying the Water Availability and Adaptation Policy Analysis (WAAPA) model. We simulated the behavior of a set of reservoirs that supply water for a set of prioritized demands, complying with specified ecological flows and accounting for evaporation losses. We applied the methodology in six representative basins of southern Europe: Duero-Douro, Ebro, Guadalquivir, Po, Maritsa-Evros, and Struma-Strymon. While in some basins, such as the Ebro or Struma-Strymon, measures can significantly increase water availability and compensate for a fraction of water scarcity due to climate change, in other basins, like the Guadalquivir, water availability cannot be enhanced by applying the management measures analyzed, and irrigation water use will have to be reduced.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirhossein Dehghanipour ◽  
Gerrit Schoups ◽  
Bagher Zahabiyoun

<p>In this study, we developed a simulation-optimization model for optimum water allocation to meet environmental flow requirements and agricultural demand. The simulation model consists of three modules: a hydrologic module, an agronomic module, and an economic module. The hydrologic module is based on a dynamic coupling of WEAP and MODFLOW, and includes water balances for the crop root zone, the surface water system, and the underlying aquifer. The agronomic module simulates the effect of deficit irrigation on crop yield response in each growth stage, while the economic module calculates the net benefit of crop production. The optimization model contains two objective functions, one related to agricultural production and the other related to environmental flows. These conflicting objective functions are maximized using the Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. Decision variables include crop acreages, minimum environmental flow requirements in the river, and the degree of deficit irrigation. We applied the simulation-optimization model to the irrigated Miyandoab plain in the semi-arid northwest of Iran, for the historical period 1984 to 2013. There is competition between irrigation demands in the plain and environmental flow requirements to downstream Lake Urmia, which has been shrinking in recent years due to decreased inflows. Our results quantify what the (Pareto) trade-off looks like between meeting environmental and agricultural water demand in the region. We find that historical water allocations were suboptimal and that both agricultural and environmental benefits can be increased by better management of cropping decisions, deficit irrigation, and environmental flow requirements. We further show that increased groundwater use for irrigation can partly alleviate the trade-off, but that it leads to significant declines in groundwater levels due to the relatively small specific yield of the aquifer.</p>


2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lautze ◽  
Meredith Reeves ◽  
Rosaura Vega ◽  
Paul Kirshen

2017 ◽  
Vol 607-608 ◽  
pp. 294-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Yan ◽  
Fulco Ludwig ◽  
He Qing Huang ◽  
Saskia E. Werners

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (14) ◽  
pp. 5421-5435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Yan ◽  
Saskia E. Werners ◽  
He Qing Huang ◽  
Fulco Ludwig

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document