The impact of stem cell transplantation on the natural course of peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a real-world experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 1241-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Rohlfing ◽  
Sascha Dietrich ◽  
Mathias Witzens-Harig ◽  
Ute Hegenbart ◽  
Stefan Schönland ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5431-5431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Reimer ◽  
Thomas Ruediger ◽  
Florian Weissinger ◽  
Hans Konrad Mueller-Hermelink ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are rare diseases and optimal treatment strategies still remain to be defined. With the exception of the ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) that shows a favourable outcome following conventional chemotherapy, PTCL are known for their poorer prognosis compared to aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, the impact of the different PTCL-subtypes on treatment outcome has not been clearly demonstrated in prospective studies. PTCL unspecified (PTCL-U) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AIL) represent the most common subtypes of PTCL in Western countries, accounting for approximately 70% of PTCL. We therefore analysed the data of our study on myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in primary diagnosed PTCL with regard to the main histologic subtypes. Material and Methods: From 06/00 to 06/06 92 patients with confirmed diagnosis of PTCL entered the study. Primary cutaneous PTCL and ALK+ ALCL were excluded from the trial. Main subtypes were PTCL-U (n= 37) and AIL (n= 28) accounting for 65 of the 92 patients (71%). 0f these patients 53 (PTCL, n= 31; AIL, n= 22) were evaluable for the analysis (82%). Results: Median age was 50 years in the PTCL-U and 47.5 years in the AIL group, respectively. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) did not differ in both groups. In the PTCL-U and the AIL group a low/intermediate-low risk was found in 35% and 36%, respectively and a high/intermediate-high risk in 65% and 64%, respectively. There were slightly more patients in stage IV in the AIL group compared to the PTCL-U group (64% versus 53%). In addition, more patients in the AIL group complained of B-symptoms and had bone marrow involvement compared to the PTCL-U group (86% versus 66% and 48% versus 39%, respectively). However, in an intent-to treat analysis only 58% in the PTCL-U group compared to 82% in the AIL group underwent ASCT mainly due to a higher rate of patients with progressive disease in the PTCL-U group. The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months in the PTCL-NOS and 20 months in the AIL group. Regarding only patients undergoing ASCT, the median OS was 13.5 months in the PTCL-U and 25.5 months in the AIL group. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that patients with AIL, although showing a slightly more unfavourable risk profile at diagnosis, benefit more from upfront autotransplantation than patients with PTCL-U in our study.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1660-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Sieniawski ◽  
James Lennard ◽  
Christopher Millar ◽  
Simon Lyons ◽  
Philip Mounter ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1660 Poster Board I-686 Background In the past two decades we have observed improvement in the outcome of patients diagnosed with some subtypes of lymphoma. However, the prognosis of patient with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) still remains unsatisfactory. We prospectively evaluated aggressive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): IVE/MTX-ASCT in patients with de-novo PTCL. Patients and methods: The regimen was piloted from 1997 for new patients eligible for intensive treatment: first for pts with enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) and subsequently for other types of PTCL. This therapy delivers one cycle of CHOP, followed by 3 courses of IVE (ifosfamide, etoposide, epirubicin), alternating with intermediate dose methotrexate (MTX). Stem cells are harvested after IVE and complete remissions (CR) were consolidated with myeloablative ASCT. The patients were evaluated with an intent to treat analysis for feasibility, response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results 57 patients were treated with the aggessive regimen, 26 pts had EATL and 31 other types of PTCL: 17 peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS, 6 anaplastic T-cell lymphoma ALK positive, 4 extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma nasal type, 3 anaplastic T-cell lymphoma ALK negative and 1 hepatosplenic gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma. The median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range 23 – 69), 36/57 (63%) pts were male and 27/55 (49%) presented with ECOG >1. Early stage disease was diagnosed in 22/57 (39%) pts and advanced disease in 35/57 (61%). Bone marrow was involved in 6/53 (11%) pts and LDH was elevated in 23/46 (50%). Among pts with primary nodal disease 14/26 (54%) had at least one extranodal site involved and 6/26 (23%) bulky disease. At present, 55 pts are available for response evaluation. Eight pts discontinued treatment prematurely; 4 due to toxicity (one severe sepsis and death, one severe encephalopathy, one bone marrow failure and one bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract), and four pts due to disease progression. Of the remaining 47 pts 33 went on to receive ASCT. ASCT was omitted due to: refractory disease in 5 pts, poor general condition in 4 pts, insufficient stem cell mobilisation in 4 pts and one pt declined further treatment. The most common severe toxicities were pancytopenia, infection, nausea/vomiting and obstruction/perforation. Complete remission was confirmed in 39/55 (71%) pts, partial remission in 3/55 (5%) pts and 13/55 (24%) pts failed the treatment. The remission rates were: CR-17/26 (65%) pts and PR-1/26 (4%) for EATL and 22/29 (76%) and 2/29 (7%), respectively for other PTCL. During the study time 17/57 (30%) pts died, 15 due to lymphoma. For all pts 3-years PFS was 59% and OS 67%. For pts with EATL the 3-years PFS and OS were 52% and 60% and for other types 65% and 72%, respectively. These results were unchanged after the exclusion of anaplastic T-cell lymphoma ALK positive: (61% and 72%, respectively). Conclusions For patients with PTCL, we propose that intensive chemotherapy and ASCT significantly improves outcome compared to CHOP-like regimens, and has acceptable toxicities. In conclusion, where feasible patients with PTCL should be considered for aggressive treatments, like IVE/MTX – ASCT as primary therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document