Phase 1 study to evaluate the effect of the MEK inhibitor trametinib on cardiac repolarization in patients with solid tumours

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amita Patnaik ◽  
Anthony Tolcher ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Murali Beeram ◽  
Drew Rasco ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2585-2585
Author(s):  
Paul L. de Souza ◽  
Marinella Messina ◽  
Ian Minns ◽  
Mikheil Shavdia ◽  
Nana Chikhladze ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 1630-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Hong ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Mitesh Borad ◽  
Jasgit Sachdev ◽  
Samuel Ejadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  

Author(s):  
Geoffrey I. Shapiro ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Afshin Dowlati ◽  
Khanh T. Do ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that can drive carcinogenesis and therapy resistance. RO6870810 is a novel, small-molecule BET inhibitor. Methods We conducted a Phase 1 study of RO6870810 administered subcutaneously for 21 or 14 days of 28- or 21-day cycles, respectively, in patients with the nuclear protein of the testis carcinoma (NC), other solid tumours, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with MYC deregulation. Results Fatigue (42%), decreased appetite (35%) and injection-site erythema (35%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated linearity over the dose range tested and support once-daily dosing. Pharmacodynamic assessments demonstrated sustained decreases in CD11b levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Objective response rates were 25% (2/8), 2% (1/47) and 11% (2/19) for patients with NC, other solid tumours and DLBCL, respectively. Responding tumours had evidence of deregulated MYC expression. Conclusions This trial establishes the safety, favourable pharmacokinetics, evidence of target engagement and preliminary single-agent activity of RO6870810. Responses in patients with NC, other solid tumours and DLBCL provide proof-of-principle for BET inhibition in MYC-driven cancers. The results support further exploration of RO6870810 as monotherapy and in combinations. Clinical trials registration NCT01987362.


2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Onozawa ◽  
J. Watanabe ◽  
N. Yamamoto ◽  
N. Boku ◽  
M. Suzuki ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark R. Middleton ◽  
Emma Dean ◽  
Thomas R. J. Evans ◽  
Geoffrey I. Shapiro ◽  
John Pollard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Berzosertib (formerly M6620, VX-970) is a highly potent and selective, first-in-class inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein kinase (ATR). We assessed multiple ascending doses of berzosertib + gemcitabine ± cisplatin in patients with resistant/refractory advanced solid tumours. Methods We evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of intravenous berzosertib + gemcitabine ± cisplatin using a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. The starting doses were berzosertib 18 mg/m2, gemcitabine 875 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2. Results Fifty-two patients received berzosertib + gemcitabine and eight received berzosertib + gemcitabine + cisplatin. Four patients receiving berzosertib + gemcitabine had a total of seven dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and three receiving berzosertib + gemcitabine + cisplatin had a total of three DLTs. Berzosertib 210 mg/m2 (days 2 and 9) + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) Q3W was established as the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D); no RP2D was determined for berzosertib + gemcitabine + cisplatin. Neither gemcitabine nor cisplatin affected berzosertib PK. Most patients in both arms achieved a best response of either partial response or stable disease. Conclusions Berzosertib + gemcitabine was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumours and showed preliminary efficacy signs. Clinical trial identifier NCT02157792.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5555-5555
Author(s):  
Robert B Kleiman ◽  
Rajesh Chopra ◽  
de Haan Hans ◽  
Kristen Hege ◽  
Angela J James ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: A variety of chemically diverse drugs are known to alter cardiac repolarization and to produce sudden cardiac death. Current regulatory guidelines therefore require the characterization of a new drug's effect on cardiac repolarization, and in particular, the effects on the QTc interval in a thorough QT/QTc study (ICH E14 Guidance, 2005). QTc studies are usually performed with healthy volunteers but may be performed in the targeted patient (pt) population if the toxicity profile of a drug precludes its use in healthy individuals. Early-phase oncology dose-escalation studies generally include pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) evaluations from relatively large pt populations, which could provide a robust data set for concurrent cardiac safety evaluation. We have combined these approaches and present the results from a first-in-human phase 1 study of CC-223, a potent and selective dual inhibitor of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinases. Patients and Methods: Adult (aged > 18 years) pts with histologically confirmed advanced non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or advanced, unresectable solid tumors who had progressed on (or were unable to tolerate) standard therapy or for whom standard therapy does not exist were eligible. The dose of CC-223, administered orally, ranged from 7.5 to 60.0 mg/day in 28-day continuous cycles. PK blood samples and corresponding triplicate electrocardiograms (ECG) were collected at 2 time points: predose and 1.5-3 hours after the dose in cycle 2. ECG analysis was performed on all pts who received ≥ 1 dose of CC-223 with baseline and on-treatment ECG results available. The primary cardiac assessment was the by time point change from baseline for cardiac interval duration measurements, including heart rate (HR), PR interval, QRS duration, and QTcF interval (QT interval corrected for HR using the Fridericia formula). Secondary analyses included a time-averaged central tendency analysis, analysis of morphology and measurement outliers, and PK/PD analysis of the relationship between the plasma concentration of CC-223 and its M1 metabolite vs QTcF change from baseline. Results: As of April 1, 2013, 158 pts met the requirements for inclusion in the ECG analysis, and of those, 149 were also included in the PK/PD analysis. The data revealed no effect of CC-223 on cardiac interval duration measurements. The by time point analyses of HR, PR, QRS, and QTcF demonstrated no clinically significant ECG effects of CC-223 during cycle 1 or subsequent cycles. The time-averaged central tendency analyses also demonstrated only small changes in cardiac interval duration. For QTcF, the time-averaged mean change from baseline was −18.5 to −1.0 ms in cycle 1 and −8.7 to 7.3 ms in subsequent cycles. There were few nonspecific ECG morphological findings and few measurement outliers. The PK/PD analysis showed no evidence of any significant exposure-effect relationship between CC-223 or the M1 metabolite and QTcF (Figure). The estimated QTcF change at the maximum concentration (Cmax) of 354 ng/mL for CC-223 was −0.2 ms, with an upper 1-sided 95% CI of 1.2 ms, and the estimated QTcF change at Cmaxof 1532 ng/mL for the M1 metabolite was 0.4 ms, with an upper 1-sided 95% CI of 1.8 ms. Adverse events (AEs) related to cardiac function included 2 reports of ventricular arrhythmias; neither event was serious, both resolved while the pts were on study, and neither were considered study drug related. Conclusions: The QTcF intervals and PK/PD relationships for CC-223 and its active metabolite revealed no significant effect on cardiac repolarization or other ECG parameters. This study used a robust data set in pts, avoided potential AE exposure in healthy volunteers, and had the additional benefit of fulfilling the QTc study requirement for new drugs by the Food and Drug Administration. As such, combining a phase 1 study with the required QTc analysis can be an improved, cost-effective approach for assessing cardiac safety during early drug development. Disclosures Kleiman: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Chopra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hans:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. James:Celgene Corporation: Equity Ownership. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Mara:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 782-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.R. Macpherson ◽  
S. Poondru ◽  
G.R. Simon ◽  
R. Gedrich ◽  
K. Brock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi118
Author(s):  
J. Rodón ◽  
K. Peltola ◽  
A. Azaro ◽  
E. Castanon Alvarez ◽  
C. Garratt ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Frappaz ◽  
Sara M. Federico ◽  
Andrew D.J. Pearson ◽  
Lia Gore ◽  
Margaret E. Macy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document