scholarly journals Hypertensive heart disease versus hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance discriminators when end-diastolic wall thickness ≥ 15 mm

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 1125-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. L. Rodrigues ◽  
Stephen Rohan ◽  
Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar ◽  
Iwan Harries ◽  
Christopher B. Lawton ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Schofield ◽  
Katia Manacho ◽  
Silvia Castelletti ◽  
James C. Moon

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease. Cardiac imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and management, with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) an important modality. CMR provides a number of different techniques in one examination: structure and function, flow imaging and tissue characterisation particularly with the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique. Other techniques include vasodilator perfusion, mapping (especially T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification [ECV]) and diffusion-weighted imaging with its potential to detect disarray. Clinically, the uses of CMR are diverse. The imaging must be considered within the context of work-up, particularly the personal and family history, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram findings. Subtle markers of possible HCM can be identified in genotype positive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)-negative subjects. CMR has particular advantages for assessment of the left ventricle (LV) apex and is able to detect both missed LVH (apical and basal antero-septum), when the echocardiography is normal but the ECG abnormal. CMR is important in distinguishing HCM from both common phenocopies (hypertensive heart disease, athletic adaptation, ageing related changes) and rarer pheno and/or genocopies such as Fabry disease and amyloidosis. For these, in particular the LGE technique and T1 mapping are very useful with a low T1 in Fabry’s, and high T1 and very high ECV in amyloidosis. Moreover, the tissue characterisation that is possible using CMR offers a potential role in patient risk stratification, as scar is a very strong predictor of future heart failure. Scar may also play a role in the prediction of sudden death. CMR is helpful in follow-up assessment, especially after septal alcohol ablation and myomectomy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 885-893
Author(s):  
Hye Na Jung ◽  
Sung Mok Kim ◽  
Jeong Hyun Lee ◽  
Yiseul Kim ◽  
Sang-Chol Lee ◽  
...  

Background Administration of gadolinium-contrast can cause problems in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients with impaired renal function. Purpose To compare patterns of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue tracking (CMR-TT) for CA and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and to assess the feasibility of CMR-TT to distinguish between these diseases without administration of gadolinium-contrast. Material and Methods Included were 54 patients with biopsy-proven CA, 40 patients with HCM, and 30 healthy people. We calculated strain ratio of apex to base (SRAB) in the left ventricle (LV) using radial (R), circumferential (C), and longitudinal (L) strain from CMR-TT. The LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and the ratio of septal to posterior wall at basal level were also calculated. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) image analysis was performed for differential diagnosis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) comparisons were used. Results All SRAB values were significantly different between CA and HCM (all P <  0.001). AUC values for parameters were 0.806 for LVEF, 0.815 for ratio of wall thickness, 0.944 for the LGE pattern, 0.898 for SRABR, 0.880 for SRABC, and 0.805 for SRABL. AUCs for the LGE pattern were significantly higher than for LVEF, ratio of wall thickness and SRABL (all P <  0.008). No significant differences were seen between AUCs for the LGE pattern, SRABR, and SRABC (all P >  0.109). Conclusion SRABR and SRABC were reliable parameters for distinguishing between CA and HCM.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1405-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C.L. Rodrigues ◽  
Antonio Matteo Amadu ◽  
Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar ◽  
Neelam Hassan ◽  
Stephen M. Lyen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Li ◽  
Jian He ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Baiyan Zhuang ◽  
Bailing Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients who have unexplained giant T-wave inversions but do not meet criteria for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (left ventricular (LV) wall thickness < 1.5 cm) demonstrate LV apical morphological features that differ from healthy subjects. Currently, it remains unknown how the abnormal LV apical morphology in this patient population changes over time. The purpose of this study was to investigate LV morphological and functional changes in these patients using a mid-term cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) exam. Methods Seventy-one patients with unexplained giant T-wave inversion who did not fulfill HCM criteria were studied. The mean interval time of the follow-up CMR was 24.4 ± 8.3 months. The LV wall thickness was measured in each LV segment according to the American Heart Association 17-segmented model. The apical angle (ApA) was also measured. A receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to identify the predictive values of the CMR variables. Results Of 71 patients, 16 (22.5%) progressed to typical apical HCM, while 55 (77.5%) did not progress to HCM criteria. The mean apical wall thickness was significantly different between the two groups at both baseline and follow-up, with the apical HCM group having greater wall thickness at both time points (all p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the change of ApA (− 1.5 ± 2.7°/yr vs. − 0.7 ± 2.0°/yr, p < 0.001) over time. The combination of mean apical wall thickness and ApA proved to be the best predictor for fulfilling criteria for apical HCM with a threshold value of 8.1 mm and 90° (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 85.5%). Conclusions CMR metrics identify predictors for progression to HCM in patients with unexplained giant T-wave inversion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document