scholarly journals Whole-body MRI versus an FDG-PET/CT-based reference standard for staging of paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective multicentre study

Author(s):  
Suzanne Spijkers ◽  
Annemieke S. Littooij ◽  
Thomas C. Kwee ◽  
Nelleke Tolboom ◽  
Auke Beishuizen ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1153-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemieke S. Littooij ◽  
Thomas C. Kwee ◽  
Ignasi Barber ◽  
Claudio Granata ◽  
Malou A. Vermoolen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. e290-e296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Iagaru ◽  
Phillip Young ◽  
Erik Mittra ◽  
David W. Dick ◽  
Robert Herfkens ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Stecco ◽  
Francesco Buemi ◽  
Martina Quagliozzi ◽  
Mariangela Lombardi ◽  
Alberto Santagostino ◽  
...  

Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences (WB-DW-MRI) with that of18F-FDG-PET/CT in the staging of patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma.Methods. This retrospective study involved 17 untreated patients with primary abdominal gastrointestinal lymphoma. All patients underwent18F-FDG-PET/CT and WB-DW-MRI. Histopathology findings or at least 6 months of clinical and radiological follow-up was the gold standard. The Musshoff-modified Ann Arbor system was used for staging, and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated on a per-node basis.Results. WB-DW-MRI exhibited 100% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, and 96.1% and 100% positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV of PET/CT were 95.9%, 100%, and 100% and 96.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniquesp=0.05. The weighted kappa agreement statistics with a 95% confidence interval were 0.97 (0.95–0.99) between the two MRI readers and 0.87 (0.82–0.92) between the two methods.Conclusions. WB-DW-MRI appears to have a comparable diagnostic value to18F-FDG-PET/CT in staging patients with gastrointestinal lymphoma.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 3597-3608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danyang Wang ◽  
Yanlei Huo ◽  
Suyun Chen ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Yingli Ding ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document