scholarly journals Prevalence of pathological FFRCT values without coronary artery stenosis in an asymptomatic marathon runner cohort

Author(s):  
Sebastian Gassenmaier ◽  
Ilias Tsiflikas ◽  
Simon Greulich ◽  
Jens Kuebler ◽  
Florian Hagen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To evaluate computed tomography fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) values in distal parts of the coronaries in an asymptomatic cohort of marathon runners without any coronary stenosis for potentially false-positive values. Methods Ninety-eight asymptomatic male marathon runners (age 53 ± 7 years) were enrolled in a prospective monocentric study and underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). CCTA data were analyzed for visual coronary artery stenosis. FFRCT was evaluated in 59 participants without coronary artery stenosis in proximal, mid, and distal coronary sections using an on-site software prototype. Results In participants without coronary artery stenosis, abnormal FFRCT values ≤ 0.8 in distal segments were found in 22 participants (37%); in 19 participants in the LAD; in 5 participants in the LCX; and in 4 participants in the RCA. Vessel diameters in participants with FFRCT values > 0.80 compared to ≤ 0.80 were 1.6 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.5 ± 0.3 mm for distal LAD (p = 0.025), 1.8 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.6 ± 0.5 mm for distal LCX (p = 0.183), and 2.0 ± 0.4 mm versus 1.5 ± 0.2 mm for distal RCA (p < 0.001). Conclusions Abnormal FFRCT values of ≤ 0.8 frequently occurred in distal coronary segments in subjects without any anatomical coronary artery stenosis. This effect is only to some degree explainable by small distal vessel diameters. Therefore, the validity of hemodynamic relevance evaluation using FFRCT in distal coronary artery segment stenosis is reduced. Key Points • Abnormal FFRCT values (≤ 0.8) occurred in over a third of the subjects in the distal LAD despite the absence of coronary artery stenosis.. • Therefore, the validity of hemodynamic relevance evaluation in distal coronary artery segment stenosis is reduced. • Decision-making based on abnormal FFRCT values in distal vessel sections should be performed with caution and only in combination with visual assessment of the grade of stenosis..

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e025793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robbert Willem van Hamersvelt ◽  
Ivana Išgum ◽  
Pim A de Jong ◽  
Maarten Jan Maria Cramer ◽  
Geert E H Leenders ◽  
...  

IntroductionAnatomic stenosis evaluation on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) lacks specificity in indicating the functional significance of a stenosis. Recent developments in CT techniques (including dual-layer spectral detector CT [SDCT] and static stress CT perfusion [CTP]) and image analyses (including fractional flow reserve [FFR] derived from CCTA images [FFRCT] and deep learning analysis [DL]) are potential strategies to increase the specificity of CCTA by combining both anatomical and functional information in one investigation. The aim of the current study is to assess the diagnostic performance of (combinations of) SDCT, CTP, FFRCTand DL for the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.Methods and analysisSeventy-five patients aged 18 years and older with stable angina and known coronary artery disease and scheduled to undergo clinically indicated invasive FFR will be enrolled. All subjects will undergo the following SDCT scans: coronary calcium scoring, static stress CTP, rest CCTA and if indicated (history of myocardial infarction) a delayed enhancement acquisition. Invasive FFR of ≤0.80, measured within 30 days after the SDCT scans, will be used as reference to indicate a functionally significant stenosis. The primary study endpoint is the diagnostic performance of SDCT (including CTP) for the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Secondary study endpoint is the diagnostic performance of SDCT, CTP, FFRCTand DL separately and combined for the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained. All subjects will provide written informed consent. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed conference presentations and journal publications.Trial registration numberNCT03139006; Pre-results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Yamanaka ◽  
K Shishido ◽  
S Yokota ◽  
N Moriyama ◽  
Y Mashimo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It has been reported that discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio (iFR) could occur in up to 20% of cases. However, there are no reports regarding discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Purpose We aimed to investigate the discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe AS. Methods Severe AS was defined as an aortic-valve area of ≤1.0 cm2, a mean aortic-valve gradient of 40mmHg or more, or a peak aortic-jet velocity of 4.0 m/s or more. Intermediate coronary artery stenosis was defined as 30% to 70% stenosis (visual estimation). FFR and iFR were calculated in 4 quadrants based on values of FFR ≤0.8 and iFR ≤0.89 (positive discordance; low FFR and high iFR, negative discordance; high FFR and low iFR). Results We examined consecutive 140 patients (164 intermediate coronary artery stenosis vessels). Mean FFR and iFR ± standard deviation was 0.82±0.09 and 0.82±0.14, respectively. The discordance was observed in 48 vessels (29.3%). In the discordant group, most of cases were negative discordance (45 cases, 93.6%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that left anterior descending artery (Hazard Ratio 3.80; 1.55 to 9.31, p=0.0036) was independently associated with negative discordance. Conclusions In patients with severe AS, the discordance between FFR and iFR could be observed in 29.3% of the vessels, mostly negative discordance. The left anterior descending artery is an independent predictor for negative discordance. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia M Carrascosa ◽  
Carlos Capuñay ◽  
Jorge Carrascosa ◽  
Alejandro Deviggiano ◽  
Alejandro Goldsmit ◽  
...  

Introduction: MDCT coronary angiography has been evolving as a noninvasive method for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). More recently, It has been demonstrated that MDCT identifies reduced contrast enhancement in ischemic and/or scarred myocardial segments. Objective: to determine the ability of rest-stress multidetector computed tomography (RS-MDCT) to detect myocardial ischemia and to assess the relationship between MDCT myocardial perfusion abnormalities and coronary artery stenosis. Methods: Forty seven patients underwent stress/rest 99mTc sestamibi SPECT and RS-MDCT, using a 16-row detector scanner (Philips Brilliance-16). Myocardial segments were classified by SPECT as normal, ischemic or scarred. SPECT results were then compared with MDCT regional myocardial contrast enhancement. The results of MDCT coronary angiography were also analyzed in 20 patients who underwent invasive catheterization. Results: The presence of a reduction in contrast enhancement at rest by MDCT identified scar by SPECT with 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity. A stress-induced reduction in contrast enhancement by MDCT identified ischemia by SPECT with 77% sensitivity and 99% specificity. The segment-based sensitivity and specificity for the detection of significant stenosis by MDCT were 92% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results showed that a rest-dipyridamole stress MDCT protocol can identify the presence of myocardial ischemia as well as the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document