Intramedullary glioependymal cyst and tethered cord in an infant

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Balasubramaniam ◽  
V. Balasubramaniam ◽  
V. Santosh
2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1191-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Cornman-Homonoff ◽  
Andrew Schweitzer ◽  
J. Levi Chazen

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 1615-1619
Author(s):  
Anthony M. Alvarado ◽  
Kyle A. Smith ◽  
Roukoz B. Chamoun

Glioependymal cysts are rare congenital lesions of the central nervous system. Reported surgical treatments of these lesions have varied and yielded mixed results, and the optimal surgical strategy is still controversial. The authors here report the clinical and surgical outcomes for three adult patients successfully treated with neuroendoscopic fenestration into the ventricular system. The patients had presented with symptomatic glioependymal cysts in the period from 2013 to 2016 at the authors’ institution. All underwent minimally invasive neuroendoscopic fenestration of the glioependymal cyst into the lateral ventricle via a stereotactically guided burr hole. Presenting clinical and radiological findings, operative courses, and postintervention outcomes were evaluated.All three patients initially presented with symptoms related to regional mass effect of the underlying glioependymal cyst, including headaches, visual disturbances, and hemiparesis. All patients were successfully treated with endoscopic fenestration of the cyst wall into the lateral ventricle, where the wall was thinnest. Postoperatively, all patients reported improvement in their presenting symptoms, and neuroimaging demonstrated decompression of the cyst. Clinical follow-up ranged from 4 months to 5 years without evidence of reexpansion of the cyst or shunt requirement.Compared to open resection and shunting of the cyst contents, minimally invasive endoscopic fenestration of a glioependymal cyst into the ventricular system is a safe and effective surgical option. This approach is practical, is less invasive than open resection, and appears to provide a long-term solution.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl F. Kothbauer ◽  
Klaus Novak

Object Intraoperative neurophysiological recording techniques have found increasing use in neurosurgical practice. The development of new recording techniques feasible while the patient receives a general anesthetic have improved their practical use in a similar way to the use of digital recording, documentation, and video technology. This review intends to provide an update on the techniques used and their validity. Methods Two principal methods are used for intraoperative neurophysiological testing during tethered cord release. Mapping identifies functional neural structures, namely nerve roots, and monitoring provides continuous information on the functional integrity of motor and sensory pathways as well as reflex circuitry. Mapping is performed mostly by using direct electrical stimulation of a structure within the surgical field and recording at a distant site, usually a muscle. Sensory mapping can also be performed with peripheral stimulation and recording within the surgical site. Monitoring of the motor system is achieved with motor evoked potentials. These are evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation and recorded from limb muscles and the external anal sphincter. The presence or absence of muscle responses are the parameters monitored. Sensory potentials evoked by tibial or pudendal nerve stimulation and recorded from the dorsal columns via an epidurally inserted electrode and/or from the scalp as cortical responses are used to access the integrity of sensory pathways. Amplitudes and latencies of these responses are then interpreted. The bulbocavernosus reflex, with stimulation of the pudendal nerve and recording of muscle responses in the external anal sphincter, is used for continuous monitoring of the reflex circuitry. Presence or absence of this response is the pertinent parameter that is monitored. Conclusions Intraoperative neurophysiology provides a wide and reliable set of techniques for intraoperative identification of neural structures and continuous monitoring of their functional integrity.


1993 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S55-S55 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Rotenstein ◽  
D Reigel ◽  
R Yuretich ◽  
J Lucke

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e611-e612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zafer Orkun Toktaş ◽  
Baran Yılmaz ◽  
Murat Şakir Ekşi ◽  
Emin Değer ◽  
Deniz Konya ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Monaco ◽  
S Filippi ◽  
F Tognetti ◽  
F Calbucci

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1757-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin M. J. Cornips ◽  
Femke G. E. M. Razenberg ◽  
Lodewijk W. van Rhijn ◽  
Dan L. H. M. Soudant ◽  
Elisabeth P. M. van Raak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document