Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Laparoscopic Assisted

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.718001594.793478386 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Sabine Tejpar ◽

Loredana Vecchione

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

A Meta-analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Results of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Conventional Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽

10.1007/s11605-011-1547-1 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 15 (8) ◽

pp. 1375-1385 ◽

Cited By ~ 57

Author(s):

Hiroshi Ohtani ◽

Yutaka Tamamori ◽

Takashi Azuma ◽

Yoshihiro Mori ◽

Yukio Nishiguchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Short And Long Term ◽

Conventional Open Surgery

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.718001594.793485823 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Brian Keith Bednarski

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Peer review report 2 on “Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Classic Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies in the Last 5 years.”

10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.068 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 37 ◽

pp. 156

Author(s):

Frank Frizelle

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Peer Review ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

High Quality ◽

Mid- and low-rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open treatment—short- and long-term results. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

International Journal of Colorectal Disease ◽

10.1007/s00384-021-04048-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mario Schietroma ◽

Lucia Romano ◽

Adriana Ionelia Apostol ◽

Silvia Vada ◽

Stefano Necozione ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Low Rectal Cancer ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Open Treatment ◽

Short And Long Term

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years

10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.123 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 39 ◽

pp. 1-10 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Ke Chen ◽

Guodong Cao ◽

Bo Chen ◽

Mingqing Wang ◽

Xingyu Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

High Quality ◽

Peer review report 3 on “Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Classic Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies in the Last 5 years”

10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.069 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 37 ◽

pp. 142-143

Author(s):

Roberto Klappenbach

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Peer Review ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

High Quality ◽

Peer review report 4 on “Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Classic Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies in the Last 5 years”

10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.070 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 37 ◽

pp. 157

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Peer Review ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

High Quality ◽

A Meta-Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Results of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Conventional Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Journal of Cancer ◽

10.7150/jca.2.425 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 2 ◽

pp. 425-434 ◽

Cited By ~ 30

Author(s):

Hiroshi Ohtani ◽

Yutaka Tamamori ◽

Yuichi Arimoto ◽

Yukio Nishiguchi ◽

Kiyoshi Maeda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Short And Long Term ◽

Conventional Open Surgery

Peer review report 1 on “Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Classic Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies in the Last 5 years”

10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.067 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 37 ◽

pp. 153

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Peer Review ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

High Quality ◽