scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Results of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Conventional Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 425-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ohtani ◽  
Yutaka Tamamori ◽  
Yuichi Arimoto ◽  
Yukio Nishiguchi ◽  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Conventional Open Surgery

A Meta-analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Results of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Conventional Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1375-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ohtani ◽  
Yutaka Tamamori ◽  
Takashi Azuma ◽  
Yoshihiro Mori ◽  
Yukio Nishiguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Conventional Open Surgery

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Short- And Long-Term Results of Randomized Controlled Trials That Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ohtani ◽  
Yutaka Tamamori ◽  
Yuichi Arimoto ◽  
Yukio Nishiguchi ◽  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Open Colectomy ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Short And Long Term

scholarly journals Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis Involving 24,783 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Qun Zhang ◽  
Bailu Wang ◽  
Yu Han ◽  
Shukun Sun ◽  
Ruijuan Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Short And Long Term

Background. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has potential benefits. This meta-analysis aimed to explore whether IVUS-guided PCI had better short- and long-term prognoses than angiography-guided PCI. Methods. We retrieved studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Clinical trials including retrospective and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared IVUS-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI were included. The patients were followed up after operation at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years. The clinical outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and MACEs, including stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and all-cause death. The study population included patients with MI, coronary bifurcation lesions, short or long lesions, and unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (ULMCA). The quality of retrospective trials was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and the quality of randomized controlled trials was evaluated using the Jadad score. A total of 20 clinical trials met the criteria. Three trials were randomized controlled trials, while 17 were retrospective trials. Results. A total of 24,783 patients were included. In observational trials, the OR of MACEs was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38–0.62) in 30 days, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.58–0.73) in one year, 0.51 (95% CI: 0.36–0.71) in two years, and 0.45 (95% CI: 0.31–0.65) in three years. In patients with long coronary lesions, the OR of MACEs in 1 year was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.28–1.50). In patients with left main artery disease, the OR of MACEs in 3 years was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.26–0.67). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower incidence of MACEs during the same following period. Conclusion. Compared with angiography-guided PCI, IVUS-guided PCI has better performance in reducing the occurrence of MACEs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document