scholarly journals Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1563-1570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Asplund ◽  
Mattias Prytz ◽  
David Bock ◽  
Eva Haglind ◽  
Eva Angenete
2017 ◽  
Vol 265 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantinos Simillis ◽  
Daniel L. H. Baird ◽  
Christos Kontovounisios ◽  
Nikhil Pawa ◽  
Gina Brown ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Bianco ◽  
G. Romano ◽  
P. Tsarkov ◽  
G. Stanojevic ◽  
K. Shroyer ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 640-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Tschmelitsch ◽  
Peter Kronberger ◽  
Rupert Prommegger ◽  
Gilbert Reibenegger ◽  
Karl Glaser ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (11) ◽  
pp. 1268-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Jia-Gang Han ◽  
Zhen-Jun Wang ◽  
Zhi-Gang Gao ◽  
Guang-Hui Wei ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Manabe ◽  
Yusuke Mizuuchi ◽  
Yasuhiro Tsuru ◽  
Hiroshi Kitagawa ◽  
Takaaki Fujimoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In contrast to open-surgery abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer, postoperative perineal hernia (PPH) is reported to increase after extralevator APE and endoscopic surgery. In this study, therefore, we aimed to determine the risk factors for PPH after endoscopic APE.Methods: A total 73 patients who underwent endoscopic APE for lower rectal cancer were collected from January 2009 to March 2020, and the risk factors for PPH were analyzed retrospectively.Results: Nineteen patients (26%) developed PPH after endoscopic APE, and the diagnosis of PPH was made at 9–393 days (median: 183 days) after initial surgery. Logistic regression analysis showed that absence of pelvic peritoneal closure alone increased the incidence of PPH significantly (odds ratio; 13.76, 95% confidence interval; 1.48–1884.84, p = 0.004).Conclusions: Pelvic peritoneal closure should be performed when possible after endoscopic APE to prevent PPH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document