Incisional hernia formation and associated risk factors on a gynecologic oncology service: an exploratory analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 294 (4) ◽  
pp. 805-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Guitarte ◽  
Jeremy Grant ◽  
Huaqing Zhao ◽  
Sugai Wang ◽  
J. Stuart Ferriss ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
M.B. Wilbur ◽  
D.B. Mannschreck ◽  
E.J. Tanner ◽  
B. Stone ◽  
K. Levinson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1697-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Nakayama ◽  
Jennie P. Ou ◽  
Caroline Friedman ◽  
Mark E. Smolkin ◽  
Linda R. Duska

IntroductionHospital readmission rates are an important measure of quality care and have recently been tied to reimbursement. This study seeks to identify the risk factors for postoperative readmission in patients treated by a gynecologic oncology service.MethodsA 7-year retrospective review (2007–2013) of all patients operated on by the University of Virginia gynecologic oncology service who were readmitted within 30 days of discharge was performed. Abstracted data included demographics, dates of surgery, operative details, cancer history, and relevant medical history. The readmitted patients (n = 166) were compared with randomly selected controls (n = 168) from the same service in a matching time frame and analyzed using univariate and multivariate models.ResultsIn the study period, 2993 operations were performed. One hundred sixty-six unique patients (5.5%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge from their operative procedure. On multivariate analysis, the factors that were associated with a higher risk of readmission were a history of psychiatric disease, postoperative complication, type of insurance, surgical modality, and lysis of adhesions at the time of surgery. The most common readmission diagnoses were infection (44%), nausea/vomiting (28%), thrombosis (6%), bowel leak (4%), and bleeding (4%).ConclusionsPostoperative readmissions are a common problem and are increasingly important as a measure of quality. Although patients were generally admitted for infections or gastrointestinal complaints, we also found that individual factors such as mental health and socioeconomic status also contributed. Our data suggest that we can preoperatively identify high-risk individuals for whom extra resources can be directed postoperatively to avoid unnecessary readmissions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balazs Fazekas ◽  
Bence Fazekas ◽  
J Hendricks ◽  
N Smart ◽  
T Arulampalam

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to identify the rate of incisional hernia formation following ileostomy reversal in patients who underwent anterior resection for colorectal cancer. In addition, we aimed to ascertain risk factors for the development of reversal-site incisional hernias and to record the characteristics of the resultant hernias. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a prospectively compiled database of colorectal cancer patients who were treated with anterior resection, we identified individuals who had undergone both ileostomy formation and subsequent reversal of their ileostomies from January 2005 to December 2014. Medical records were reviewed to record descriptive patient data about risk factors for hernia formation, operative details and any subsequent operations. Computed tomography reports were reviewed to identify the number, site and characteristics of incisional hernias. RESULTS A total of 121 patients were included in this study; 14.9% (n = 18) developed an incisional hernia at the ileostomy reversal site; 17.4% (n = 21) at a non-ileostomy site and 6.6% (n = 8) developed both. The reversal-site hernias were smaller both in width and length compared with the non-ileostomy-site hernias. Risk factors for the development of reversal-site incisional hernias were higher body mass index (BMI), lower age, open surgery, longer reversal time and a history of previous hernias. We did not detect a difference in the size of the incisional hernias that developed in patients with these specific risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Incisional hernias are a significant complication of ileostomy reversal. Further evaluation of the use of prophylactic mesh to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias may be worthwhile.


2004 ◽  
Vol 191 (4) ◽  
pp. 1138-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis S. Chi ◽  
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum ◽  
Yukio Sonoda ◽  
Chris Awtrey ◽  
Amanda Hummer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Struller ◽  
I. Koenigsrainer ◽  
P. Horvath ◽  
A. Koenigsrainer ◽  
S. Beckert

Background: Incisional hernia formation has been reported as high as 20% within 1 year following midline laparotomy. Since hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is likely to impair wound healing, we sought to investigate the incidence of incisional hernia formation and abdominal wall rupture following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Methods: Consecutive patients with radiographic evidence of peritoneal metastases were scheduled for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Between May 2005 and May 2014, 271 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Within follow-up, 19 (7%) incisional hernias and 11 (4%) abdominal wall ruptures were observed. Age ⩾70 years, cardio-pulmonary comorbidity, the presence of pseudomyxoma peritonei or mesothelioma, and postoperative abdominal wall rupture were detected as risk factors for hernia formation. However, Cox multivariate analysis only confirmed the presence of pseudomyxoma peritonei or mesothelioma and postoperative abdominal wall rupture as independent risk factors. Conclusion: Our data do not suggest that cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is necessarily associated with a higher incidence of incisional hernia formation. However, patients suffering from pseudomyxoma peritonei or mesothelioma and patients with postoperative abdominal wall rupture seem to be at risk for developing incisional herniation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1189
Author(s):  
Mohammed Faheem Inamdar ◽  
Amit Raj Singh ◽  
N. M. Inamdar

Background: Incisional hernia is a common surgical condition accounting for 15% to 20% of all abdominal wall hernias. Of all hernias, they can be the most frustrating and difficult to treat. Several technical and patient-related factors have been linked to their occurrence. There is no conclusive evidence that demonstrates that the type of suture or technique of incisional closure at the primary operation affects hernia formation. Recurrence rates (10-50%) and are typically reduced by more than half with the use of prosthetic mesh. People of all ages and ethnic backgrounds may develop an incisional hernia after abdominal surgery. This study was an effort to evaluate the risk factors, clinical presentations and polypropylene mesh repair (pre-peritoneal) management of incisional hernia.Methods: A total of 50 patients having incisional hernias admitted in our hospital between 2009 to 2011 have been studied. Strangulated, incarcerated, unfit patients with recurrent hernias and pregnancy have been excluded. Preperitoneal mesh repair was done in all the patients and follow up was done for 2 years.Results: Incisional hernia is more common in the obese and in middle aged females. Common risk factors are post op infection, obesity and multiparity. Most of the patients had incisional hernia within a year of previous surgery.Conclusions: Females are more prone. Most patients present as abdominal swelling with cough impulse and reducible on lying supine. Most of them occur within a year of previous surgery. Common risk factors include obesity, post op infections and multiparity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carter T. Smith ◽  
Micah G. Katz ◽  
David Foley ◽  
Bridget Welch ◽  
Glen E. Leverson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document