The effects of surgery for endometriosis on pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 294 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cristina Rossi ◽  
Federico Prefumo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

scholarly journals The impact of isolated non-cavity distorting intramural fibroids on pregnancy outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. e345
Author(s):  
Kiran Rikhraj ◽  
Justin Tan ◽  
Omur Taskin ◽  
Arianne Y.K. Albert ◽  
Catherine Allaire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Intramural Fibroids

Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Roque ◽  
Karinna Lattes ◽  
Sandra Serra ◽  
Ivan Solà ◽  
Selmo Geber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

scholarly journals The impact of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e0175501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-Yi Huang ◽  
Min-Hua Rong ◽  
Ai-Hua Lan ◽  
Xiao-Miao Lin ◽  
Xing-Gu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Ectopic pregnancy rates in frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly S. Acharya ◽  
Meredith P. Provost ◽  
Jason S. Yeh ◽  
Chaitanya R Acharya ◽  
Suheil J. Muasher
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

scholarly journals Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Protocol of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Yang ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Guixing Xu ◽  
Zihao Zou ◽  
Mingsheng Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Childbearing Age ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Acupoint Stimulation

Abstract Background Infertility is a common health problem affecting couples at childbearing age. The proposal of in vitro fertilization (IVF) solves the problem of infertility to a certain extent. However, the average IVF success rates are low. Some studies conclude that transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) could improve pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF. In consideration of the lack of comprehensive synthesis and evaluation of existing evidence, conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis is planned to determine whether TEAS is effective and safe to improve the pregnancy outcomes for women undergoing IVF. Methods Eight online databases will be searched from inception to June 2021. In addition, four clinical trial registries will also be searched, relevant references will be screened, and experts will be consulted for possible eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included patients with infertility who underwent IVF and used TEAS as the main adjuvant treatment versus non-TEAS or sham TEAS control will be included. The clinical pregnancy rate will be considered as the primary outcome. Ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, emotion-related indicators, adverse events related to interventions, and other relevant indicators will be regarded as secondary outcomes. The selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent researchers using Endnote software V.9.1 and RevMan software V.5.3. Moreover, data synthesis will be conducted using RevMan software V.5.3 and R software V.3.6.1. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary because the current study will not include the original information of the individuals. We plan to publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant conferences. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021238871

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document