Outcomes of nonsurgical versus surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies in the first trimester

2017 ◽  
Vol 296 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Washburn ◽  
Katherine Pocius ◽  
Daniela Carusi
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-452
Author(s):  
Yu-huan LIU ◽  
Ning HUI ◽  
Ming-juan XU ◽  
Hui ZHANG ◽  
Rui GUAN ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-67
Author(s):  
Nasima Begum ◽  
Shahnaz Akhter ◽  
Luna Laila

Introduction: Misoprostol is increasingly used to treat women who have a failed pregnancy may be due to blighted ovum (anembryonic gestation), incomplete abortion, missed abortion, inevitable abortion in the first trimester. Medical treatment with Misoprostol is an alternative to conventional surgical treatment. Use of Misoprostol is simple, highly acceptable, noninvasive and preferred by women. In addition to surgical risk and patient's preference, medical evacuation reduces the need for hospital stay and the overall management cost. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of Misoprostol for evacuation of uterus in early pregnancy loss and to compare the result with surgical evacuation. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective randomized study conducted on 50 patients at the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Border Guard Hospital, Dhaka during the period from February 2018 to July 2019. Here 25 patients received Misoprostol as medical treatment and 25 patients received surgical treatment. Results: Of the 25 women assigned to receive Misoprostol, 19(76%) had complete expulsion by 24 hours and 22(88%) by 7 days. Complete evacuation after 1st dose was 68% and after 2nd dose 88%. Misoprostol treatment failed in 3(12%) cases and required surgical evacuation. Among the respondents 80% women stated that they would use Misoprostol again if the need arises. Conclusion: Medical treatment with Misoprostol is a cheaper alternative to surgery. Given its success rate near about 88% with mild side effects controllable with additional medication and above all patient’s satisfaction, it should be prioritized over the evacuation curettage in patients who meet the treatment criteria. JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 16, No 2 (December) 2020: 63-67


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (217) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prishita Shah ◽  
Rosina Manandhar ◽  
Meena Thapa ◽  
Rachana Saha

Cesarean scar pregnancy is a rare variant of ectopic pregnancy where the fertilized ovum gets implanted in the myometrium of the previous cesarean scar. The incidence of CSP among ectopic pregnancies is 6.1% and it is seen in approximately 1 in 2000 normal pregnancies.As trophoblastic invasion of the myometrium can result in uterine rupture and catastrophic hemorrhage termination of pregnancy is the treatment of choice if diagnosed in the first trimester. Expectant treatment has a poor prognosis and may lead to uterine rupture which may require hysterectomy and subsequent loss of fertility. We present a case report of a 24year old femaleG2P1L1with ruptured cesarean scar pregnancy who underwent emergency laparotomy and subsequently hysterectomy. In this case report, we aim to discuss ruptured cesarean scar pregnancy as obstetric emergency and methods by which we can make an early diagnosis that can be managed appropriately as to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Jurkovic ◽  
J. Knez ◽  
A. Appiah ◽  
L. Farahani ◽  
D. Mavrelos ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0210449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cubo Nava ◽  
Zandra M. Soto Pino ◽  
Ana M. Haro Pérez ◽  
M. Estrella Hernández Hernández ◽  
M. José Doyague Sánchez ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Y. Michaels ◽  
Erin E. Washburn ◽  
Katherine D. Pocius ◽  
Carol B. Benson ◽  
Peter M. Doubilet ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 504-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elysia Moschos ◽  
Sreedevi Sreenarasimhaiah ◽  
Diane M. Twickler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document