scholarly journals Penetrating eye injury by dart

Author(s):  
Tanja Germerott ◽  
N. Mann ◽  
S. Axmann

AbstractDarts are constantly gaining in popularity. However, their risk of injury is often underestimated. This report is about a juvenile who suffered from a severe eye injury including the opening of the eye bulb. The attending ophthalmologists ruled out the possibility that this kind of injury could be caused by a dart with a plastic point. However, by reconstructing the course of action and throwing darts at porcine eyes, the forensic medical advisory opinion was able to state that darts with damaged plastic points may cause the exact same form of injury. This casuistic illustrates the essential significance of forensic-traumatological knowledge and, especially in the case of rare injury patterns, case-related practical experiments.

Author(s):  
K.M. Saidzhamolov ◽  
◽  
E.V. Gromakina ◽  
S.K. Makhmadzoda ◽  
◽  
...  

Purpose. To assess the severity of penetrating eye trauma in children in Tajikistan. Material and methods. Retrospectively there was analyzed 277 case histories of children with a diagnosis of penetrating eye injury, admitted to the children’s department of the National Medical Centre of the Republic of Tajikistan for the provision of specialized ophthalmological care. Results. The average age of children at the time of injury to the organ of sight was 7.06 ± 3.01 years, mainly these were villagers (70%). Children under 7 years old accounted for 57.8% of those admitted to the hospital. The terms of admission to the hospital ranged from 1 to 14 days, an average of 43.02 ± 33.35 hours. The severity is caused by damage to 2 or more structures of the eyeball in 81,3%. Wounds larger than 6 mm prevailed and amounted to 63,5%. Endophthalmitis at admission was noted in 8,3% of cases. Enucleation was performed in 2 children; 244 children underwent primary surgical treatment. Visual acuity at discharge was higher than 0.1 in 72 of 275 children (26.2%), lower than 0,1 in 194 (70.7%). Conclusion. Almost every second child (43.0%) is admitted to the hospital for primary surgical treatment of an eyeball wound after 24 hours. About 2/3 of cases of eye damage are characterized by large wound sizes. Stab wounds were noted in 90.2% of cases. In 58.8% of cases, damage to the cornea was observed and in 68.6% – damage to the lens area.


1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 309-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Süheyla Köse ◽  
Özean Kayikçioglu ◽  
Cezmi Akkin ◽  
Ayşe Yagci ◽  
Gülçin Bašdemir

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Okano ◽  
Takatoshi Sawada ◽  
Katsunori Inagaki

Bipolar dislocation of the clavicle is a rare injury that is defined as a concomitant dislocation of the ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint and sternoclavicular joint. This injury is also described as a floating clavicle. Although this injury has been known for nearly two centuries, knowledge about it is limited and the treatment strategy remains controversial. Bipolar dislocation includes several combinations of both joints’ injury types. We reported two patients with bipolar dislocation of the clavicle: one with an anterior dislocation and the other with a posterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint. After reviewing the currently available literature, we discussed these cases to highlight the necessity of a specific treatment approach that is modified based on the pattern of each joint’s lesion.


QJM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 627-627
Author(s):  
S R Singh ◽  
S Yangzes ◽  
J Ram

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
Kabindra Bajracharya ◽  
Salma KC Rai ◽  
Arjun Malla Bhari ◽  
Hari Bahadur Thapa ◽  
Anjita Hirachan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Penetrating eye injury is an important cause of visual impairment in pediatric population.Aims and Objectives: To study the epidemiology and visual outcome of penetrating eye injuries in pediatric population presented to Lumbini Eye Institute, the tertiary eye hospital of western Nepal.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Lumbini Eye Institute over a period of one year from June 2014 to May 2015. All patients of penetrating eye injuries up to the age of 15 years were included in the study. The demographics of the patient, cause and duration of injury were recorded. The presenting and final best corrected visual acuity, anterior and posterior segment findings were recorded in specially designed proforma.Results: A total number of 127 children (127 eyes) presented with penetrating eye injuries during a year. The incidence of penetrating eye injury in one year was 127 out of 12927 new patients. Minimum age was 11 months, while the maximum age was 15 years with mean of 7.29 years (SD= ±3.49). Male and female patients were 99 (78%) and 28 (22%) respectively. Involvement of right eye was seen in 69 cases (54.33%) and left eye 58 (45.67%). The most common cause of injury was wooden stick in 55 cases (43.31%) followed by iron wire 12 (9.45%) and the stone 11 (8.66%). Corneal laceration was found in 102 cases (80.31%), scleral laceration in 10 (7.87%) and corneo-scleral laceration in 15 (11.81%). Seventy three percent patients were blind at the time of presentation whereas at discharge 37.63% were blind and 11.43% of patients had visual acuity better than 6/18 at presentation whereas 35.48% had visual acuity better than 6/18 after treatment.Conclusion: Penetrating eye injury is one of the common causes attending Pediatric Ophthalmology Department. Penetrating eye injury is common in male and majority of trauma is caused by wooden stick. The awareness of ocular trauma and its consequences should be increased to reduce incidence of childhood blindness.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.7(4) 2016 84-87


1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 994-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimon Rumelt ◽  
Gerda Jager ◽  
Uri Rehany

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Dettoraki ◽  
Konstantinos Andreanos ◽  
Stavroula Davou ◽  
Nikolaos Nomikarios ◽  
Marilita M Moschos ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Jonathan Chiew ◽  
David Choy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document