Standardizing procedures improves and homogenizes short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 403 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Oshikiri ◽  
Tetsu Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Hasegawa ◽  
Masashi Yamamoto ◽  
Shingo Kanaji ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Mine ◽  
Masayuki Watanabe ◽  
Atushi Kanamori ◽  
Yu Imamura ◽  
Akihiko Okamura ◽  
...  

Abstract   Although minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been performed for esophageal cancer worldwide, intra-thoracic anastomosis under prone positions is still challenging. In this retrospective study, we reviewed our short-term results of this anastomotic technique in our institution. Methods From November 2016 to December 2019, we performed 319 esophagectomies. Of these patients, 28 patients (9%) underwent intra-thoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis under MIE. Procedures The left side of an esophageal stump which had been closed using a linear stapler was opened for anastomosis. Then, the anterior wall of a gastric conduit, around 5 cm below the tip, was opened for anastomosis. Linear staplers were inserted in both esophageal stump and gastric conduit and side-to-side anastomosis was performed. The opening for insertion was closed using a hand-sewn anastomosis in 2 layers. Results Five patients (18%) suffered anastomotic leakage with Clavien-Dindo 2 and 3a, and all of them recovered by conservative treatments. Two patients (2/19, 11%) showed anastomotic stricture which improved by several endoscopic dilatations. Six patients (6/19, 32%) showed the reflux esophagitis of Grade C. Conclusion Although we have not experienced severe or critical post-operative complications, the short-term results of intra-thoracic anastomosis under MIE were not sufficient. Additional progresses in techniques are required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 3470-3478
Author(s):  
Alison L. Halpern ◽  
Chloe Friedman ◽  
Robert J. Torphy ◽  
Mohammed H. Al-Musawi ◽  
John D. Mitchell ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 831-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Uchihara ◽  
Naoya Yoshida ◽  
Yoshifumi Baba ◽  
Yuichiro Nakashima ◽  
Yasue Kimura ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 823-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory D. Crenshaw ◽  
Suven S. Shankar ◽  
Russell E. Brown ◽  
Abbas E. Abbas ◽  
John S. Bolton

Esophageal cancer resection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To date, no standardized technique exists. In this study, we analyze our short-term results in 92 minimally invasive resections performed over the past 10 years in an attempt to identify technical factors, which contribute to improved short-term outcomes. A retrospective review of 92 minimally invasive esophagectomies was performed at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation from 1999 through 2009. Data collected included preoperative stage, whether or not preoperative chemoradiation was used, technique of minimally-invasive resection, technique of esophagogastric anastomosis, margin status, anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, gastric conduit failure of any type, and operative mortality. Gastric stapling was done either laparoscopically (intracorporeal) or through a minilaparotomy (extracorporeal). Ninety-two patients met criteria for this study. There was a significant difference in the incidence of positive gastric margins ( P = 0.04), anastomotic leak ( P = 0.045), conduit necrosis ( P = 0.03), and any gastric conduit failure ( P = 0.02) favoring the extracorporeal group. The overall short-term morbidity and operative mortality with minimally invasive esophagectomy is comparable to the results obtained with open techniques. A relatively simple modification of the operative technique—performing extracorporeal stapling of the gastric conduit—led to a significant reduction in the incidence of gastric conduit failures when compared with the intracorporeal stapling technique.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. S58
Author(s):  
K. Rehmani ◽  
K.V.V.N. Raju ◽  
S. Patnaik ◽  
V. Naik ◽  
R. Rajagopalan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Koshiro Ishiyama ◽  
Takeo Fujita ◽  
Hisashi Fujiwara ◽  
Daisuke Kurita ◽  
Junya Oguma ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Tagkalos ◽  
der Sluis P C van ◽  
E Hadzijusufovic ◽  
B Babic ◽  
E Uzun ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to describe postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes for RAMIE4 with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer within our case series of 100 consecutive patients. Background & Methods Robot assisted minimally-invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis is gaining popularity as a treatment for esophageal cancer. In this study, we present the results of 100 RAMIE procedures using the da Vinci Xi robotic system (RAMIE4). The aim of this study was to describe postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes for RAMIE4 within our case series of 100 consecutive patients. Between January 2017 and February 2019, data of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively collected. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using an identical intrathoracic anastomotic reconstruction technique with the same perioperative management and pain control regimen. Intra-operatively and post operatively complications were graded according to definitions stated by the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Results Mean duration of the surgical procedure was 416 min (± 80). In total, 70 patients (70%) had an uncomplicated operative procedure and postoperative recovery. Pulmonary complications were most common and were observed in 17 patients (17 %). Anastomotic leakage was observed in 8 patients (8%). Median ICU stay was 1 day and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 11 days. 30 day mortality was 1%. A R0 resection was reached in 92% of patients with a median number of 29 dissected lymph nodes. Conclusion RAMIE4 with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer or cancer located in the esophagus was technically feasible and safe. Postoperative complications and short term oncologic results were comparable to the highest international standards nowadays. These results could only be obtained due to a structured RAMIE training pathway. The superiority of RAMIE compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagus is currently investigated in multiple randomized controlled trials. Results of these trials will define the role for RAMIE for patients with esophageal cancer in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document