Parasite protein phosphatases: biological function, virulence, and host immune evasion

Author(s):  
Jenny Nancy Gómez-Sandoval ◽  
Alma Reyna Escalona-Montaño ◽  
Abril Navarrete-Mena ◽  
M. Magdalena Aguirre-García
1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 4771-4779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin K. A. Tetteh ◽  
Alex Loukas ◽  
Cindy Tripp ◽  
Rick M. Maizels

ABSTRACT Larvae of Toxocara canis, a nematode parasite of dogs, infect humans, causing visceral and ocular larva migrans. In noncanid hosts, larvae neither grow nor differentiate but endure in a state of arrested development. Reasoning that parasite protein production is orientated to immune evasion, we undertook a random sequencing project from a larval cDNA library to characterize the most highly expressed transcripts. In all, 266 clones were sequenced, most from both 3′ and 5′ ends, and similarity searches against GenBank protein and dbEST nucleotide databases were conducted. Cluster analyses showed that 128 distinct gene products had been found, all but 3 of which represented newly identified genes. Ninety-five genes were represented by a single clone, but seven transcripts were present at high frequencies, each composing >2% of all clones sequenced. These high-abundance transcripts include a mucin and a C-type lectin, which are both major excretory-secretory antigens released by parasites. Four highly expressed novel gene transcripts, termed ant (abundant novel transcript) genes, were found. Together, these four genes comprised 18% of all cDNA clones isolated, but no similar sequences occur in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. While the coding regions of the four genes are dissimilar, their 3′ untranslated tracts have significant homology in nucleotide sequence. The discovery of these abundant, parasite-specific genes of newly identified lectins and mucins, as well as a range of conserved and novel proteins, provides defined candidates for future analysis of the molecular basis of immune evasion by T. canis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ries Langley ◽  
Deepa Patel ◽  
Nicola Jackson ◽  
Fiona Clow ◽  
John D. Fraser
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Cristina Terlizzi ◽  
Viviana De Rosa ◽  
Francesca Iommelli ◽  
Giovanna G. Altobelli ◽  
Rosa Fonti ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrés L. Jaume

RESUMENEl presente artículo analiza las diferentes teorías que sobre el concepto de función se han vertido en los últimos cuarenta años y sus problemas. Respecto de los dos grandes enfoques (histórico-etiológico y sistémico) se sostiene que el primero, pese a su hegemonía histórica, presenta considerables dificultades y que la reflexión actual se centra cada vez más en la perspectiva sistémica. Esta última puede enfrentarse mejor a los diversos problemas que genera el concepto de función biológica y es siempre preferible.PALABRAS CLAVEFUNCIÓN BIOLÓGICA, FUNCIÓN SISTéMICA, EXPLICACIÓN FUNCIONAL, EXPLICACIÓN BASADA EN MECANISMOS, TELEOLOGíAABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the different theories on biological function and the problems they brought up over the last forty years. Concerning the two most important points of view on functions (aetiological theory and systemic theory) I hold that the aetiological theory, despite its historical hegemony, presents substantial difficulties and that the present philosophical thinking is centred on systemic theories. Systemic theories are capable of solving the various problems generated by the biological function concept which is preferable.KEYWORDSBIOLOGICAL FUNCTION, SySTEMIC FUNCTION, FUNCTIONAL EXPLANATION, MECHANISTIC EXPLANATION TELEOLOGY


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document