scholarly journals Challenges in the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) in young children facilitated by means of revised diagnostic criteria including genetic testing for pathogenic NF1 gene variants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki ◽  
David N. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Early Adulthood ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Clinical Feature ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Legius Syndrome ◽  
Nf1 Gene

AbstractNeurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is the most frequent disorder associated with multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM) which may either be present at birth or appear during the first year of life. Other NF1-associated features such as skin-fold freckling and Lisch nodules occur later during childhood whereas dermal neurofibromas are rare in young children and usually only arise during early adulthood. The NIH clinical diagnostic criteria for NF1, established in 1988, include the most common NF1-associated features. Since many of these features are age-dependent, arriving at a definitive diagnosis of NF1 by employing these criteria may not be possible in infancy if CALM are the only clinical feature evident. Indeed, approximately 46% of patients who are diagnosed with NF1 later in life do not meet the NIH diagnostic criteria by the age of 1 year. Further, the 1988 diagnostic criteria for NF1 are not specific enough to distinguish NF1 from other related disorders such as Legius syndrome. In this review, we outline the challenges faced in diagnosing NF1 in young children, and evaluate the utility of the recently revised (2021) diagnostic criteria for NF1, which include the presence of pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene and choroidal anomalies, for achieving an early and accurate diagnosis.

scholarly journals Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: an international consensus recommendation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Legius ◽  
Ludwine Messiaen ◽  
Pierre Wolkenstein ◽  
Patrice Pancza ◽  
Robert A. Avery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Consensus Recommendation ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Legius Syndrome ◽  
Multistep Process ◽  
Patient Advocacy Groups

Abstract Purpose By incorporating major developments in genetics, ophthalmology, dermatology, and neuroimaging, to revise the diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and to establish diagnostic criteria for Legius syndrome (LGSS). Methods We used a multistep process, beginning with a Delphi method involving global experts and subsequently involving non-NF experts, patients, and foundations/patient advocacy groups. Results We reached consensus on the minimal clinical and genetic criteria for diagnosing and differentiating NF1 and LGSS, which have phenotypic overlap in young patients with pigmentary findings. Criteria for the mosaic forms of these conditions are also recommended. Conclusion The revised criteria for NF1 incorporate new clinical features and genetic testing, whereas the criteria for LGSS were created to differentiate the two conditions. It is likely that continued refinement of these new criteria will be necessary as investigators (1) study the diagnostic properties of the revised criteria, (2) reconsider criteria not included in this process, and (3) identify new clinical and other features of these conditions. For this reason, we propose an initiative to update periodically the diagnostic criteria for NF1 and LGSS.

scholarly journals Clinical features and disease severity in patients with mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1: a single-center study and literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ejerskov ◽  
M. Raundahl ◽  
P. A. Gregersen ◽  
M. M. Handrup
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Learning Disability ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Plexiform Neurofibroma ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Language Delay

Abstract Background The mosaic form of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is called mosaic NF1 (MNF1). No specific MNF1 follow-up guidelines exist. It is debatable if patients with MNF1 should be clinically examined and undergo follow-up in accordance with the standard NF1 guidelines, as MNF1 patients more often may develop more benign phenotypes and thereby less disease-associated complications including cognitive impairment. We discussed the need for a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline with focus on frequency of plexiform neurofibromas and NF1-associated complications. Method A systematic retrospective data collection in a MNF1 cohort from one of two Danish national centers of NF1 Expertise was completed. Data collected included demographics, clinical features including NF1 diagnostic criteria and NF1-associated complications. Recent literature in the field was reviewed. Results We identified 17 patients with MNF1 with a median age of 37 years [4; 66]. Eleven (65%) were females. Five patients (30%) had a plexiform neurofibroma. The median age at detection of plexiform neurofibroma was 30 years [14; 60]. Nine (53%) had at least one NF1-related complication; scoliosis, hypertension, ADHD, learning disability, language delay, autism and delay in gross and fine motor function development. We reviewed nine articles. In total, 126 cases were described within three case-series. Nineteen (15%) had a plexiform neurofibroma and in total, 23 NF1-associated complications were reported including language delay, learning disability and skeletal abnormalities. Furthermore, from the literature it was evident that the diagnosing of MNF1 varies among physicians and across countries. Conclusion Patients with MNF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas and other NF1-related complications with a frequency requiring that follow-up of MNF1 patients should be in accordance with the standard NF1 guideline in both childhood and adulthood. Physicians should be aware of cognitive impairment as a complication to MNF1. To develop a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline, there is a need for an international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MNF1 and a follow-up study conducted in a larger MNF1 cohort.

A highly informative CA/GT repeat polymorphism in intron 38 of the human neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene

1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conxi L�zaro ◽  
Antonia Gaona ◽  
Ganfeng Xu ◽  
Robert Weiss ◽  
Xavier Estivill
Keyword(s):  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Repeat Polymorphism ◽  
Nf1 Gene

scholarly journals Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1879
Author(s):  
Marcello Scala ◽  
Irene Schiavetti ◽  
Francesca Madia ◽  
Cristina Chelleri ◽  
Gianluca Piccolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Single Nucleotide Variants ◽  
Multivariate Statistical ◽  
Gene Deletions ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Lisch Nodules ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a proteiform genetic condition caused by pathogenic variants in NF1 and characterized by a heterogeneous phenotypic presentation. Relevant genotype–phenotype correlations have recently emerged, but only few pertinent studies are available. We retrospectively reviewed clinical, instrumental, and genetic data from a cohort of 583 individuals meeting at least 1 diagnostic National Institutes of Health (NIH) criterion for NF1. Of these, 365 subjects fulfilled ≥2 NIH criteria, including 235 pediatric patients. Genetic testing was performed through cDNA-based sequencing, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). Uni- and multivariate statistical analysis was used to investigate genotype–phenotype correlations. Among patients fulfilling ≥ 2 NIH criteria, causative single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in 267/365 (73.2%) and 20/365 (5.5%) cases. Missense variants negatively correlated with neurofibromas (p = 0.005). Skeletal abnormalities were associated with whole gene deletions (p = 0.05) and frameshift variants (p = 0.006). The c.3721C>T; p.(R1241*) variant positively correlated with structural brain alterations (p = 0.031), whereas Lisch nodules (p = 0.05) and endocrinological disorders (p = 0.043) were associated with the c.6855C>A; p.(Y2285*) variant. We identified novel NF1 genotype–phenotype correlations and provided an overview of known associations, supporting their potential relevance in the implementation of patient management.

scholarly journals Mutational spectrum of NF1 gene in 24 unrelated Egyptian families with neurofibromatosis type 1

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahla Abdel‐Aziz ◽  
Ghada El‐Kamah ◽  
Rabab Khairat ◽  
Hanan Mohamed ◽  
Yehia Gad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Mutational Spectrum ◽  
Nf1 Gene

A deletion in the 5 ′-region of the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene

1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Hoffmeyer ◽  
Günter Assum ◽  
Dieter Kaufmann ◽  
Kirsten Schwenk ◽  
Winfrid Krone
Keyword(s):  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Nf1 Gene

scholarly journals Clinical features and disease severity in patients with mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1: a single-center study and literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Ejerskov ◽  
Maj Raundahl ◽  
Pernille Axel Gregersen ◽  
Mette Møller Handrup
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Learning Disability ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Plexiform Neurofibroma ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Language Delay

Abstract BackgroundThe mosaic form of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is called mosaic NF1 (MNF1). No specific MNF1 follow-up guidelines exist. It is debatable if patients with MNF1 should be clinically examined and undergo follow-up in accordance with the standard NF1 guidelines, as MNF1 patients more often may develop more benign phenotypes and thereby less disease-associated complications including cognitive impairment. We discussed the need for a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline with focus on frequency of plexiform neurofibromas and NF1-associated complications.MethodA systematic retrospective data collection in a MNF1 cohort from one of two Danish national centers of NF1 Expertise was completed. Data collected included demographics, clinical features including NF1 diagnostic criteria and NF1-associated complications. Recent literature in the field was reviewed.ResultsWe identified 17 patients with MNF1 with a median age of 37 years [4; 66]. Eleven (65%) were females. Five patients (30%) had a plexiform neurofibroma. The median age at detection of plexiform neurofibroma was 30 years [14; 60]. Nine (53%) had at least one NF1-related complication; scoliosis, hypertension, ADHD, learning disability, language delay, autism and delay in gross and fine motor function development. We reviewed nine articles. In total, 126 cases were described within three case-series. Nineteen (15%) had a plexiform neurofibroma and in total, 23 NF1-associated complications were reported including language delay, learning disability and skeletal abnormalities. Furthermore, from the literature it was evident that the diagnosing of MNF1 varies among physicians and across countries. ConclusionPatients with MNF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas and other NF1-related complications with a frequency requiring that follow-up of MNF1 patients should be in accordance with the standard NF1 guideline in both childhood and adulthood. Physicians should be aware of cognitive impairment as a complication to MNF1. To develop a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline, there is a need for an international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MNF1 and a follow-up study conducted in a larger MNF1 cohort.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document