Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1618-1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Zhang ◽  
D. I. Watson ◽  
C. Lally ◽  
J. R. Bessell
1998 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. A29
Author(s):  
J. Menzel ◽  
H. Nottberg ◽  
N. Hoepffner ◽  
N. Senninger ◽  
W. Domschke

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Heidemann ◽  
Martin K. Schilling ◽  
Adrian Schmassmann ◽  
Christoph A. Maurer ◽  
Markus W. Büchler

1988 ◽  
pp. 177-180
Author(s):  
J. Laas ◽  
E. Scheller ◽  
A. Haverich ◽  
K. Frimpong ◽  
Ph. Hendrickx ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henryk Dancygier ◽  
Thomas Rösch ◽  
Reinhard Lorenz ◽  
Wolfgang Gössner ◽  
Jörg R. Siewert ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Onbaş ◽  
Atilla Eroglu ◽  
Mecit Kantarci ◽  
Pinar Polat ◽  
Fatih Alper ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 940-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishaan Kalha ◽  
Madhukar Kaw ◽  
Norio Fukami ◽  
Mihir Patel ◽  
Sandeep Singh ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
H. Lee ◽  
J. H. Lee

20 Background: The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for preoperative staging of gastric cancer varies. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of EUS T and N staging in all and non-serosal exposed cases and identify the histopathological factors influencing accuracy. Methods: A total of 309 gastric cancer patients with confirmed pathological staging underwent EUS examination for preoperative staging at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Korea, between January and December 2009. Of these, 262 patients were diagnosed with non-serosal exposed gastric cancer. Results: Overall accuracies of EUS for T stage, the detailed T stages of all cases, and the detailed T stage in the non-serosal exposed group were 70.2%, 43.0%, and 41.2%, respectively. In the non-serosal exposed group, tumors greater than 5 cm in diameter were significantly associated with T overstaging (odds ratio [OR], 2.583). The overall accuracies of EUS for N staging in all cases and in the non-serosal exposed group were 71.2% and 76.7%, respectively. Tumor size (2 cm ≤ size < 5 cm; OR, 4.467; and 5 cm ≤ size; OR, 8.668) and tumor depth (submucosa; OR, 3.267; muscular propria; OR, 6.675 and subserosa; OR, 4.831) were significant factors affecting incorrect nodal detection in non-serosal exposed gastric cancer cases. Conclusions: Careful attention is required during EUS examination of large-sized gastric cancers to increase accuracy, especially for T staging. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document