Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Mizushima ◽  
Mototsugu Kato ◽  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
Fumiyuki Sato ◽  
Kimitoshi Kubo ◽  
...  
Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki Okamoto ◽  
Tomohiro Watanabe ◽  
Yoriaki Komeda ◽  
Tatsuya Kono ◽  
Kouta Takashima ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
A. A. Likutov ◽  
D. A. Mtvralashvili ◽  
M. A. Nagudov ◽  
O. M. Yugai ◽  
Yu. E. Vaganov ◽  
...  

Aim: to identify the risk factors for conversion of endoscopic submucosal dissection to abdominal surgery.Patients and methods: the prospective cohort study included 405 patients: 166 (40.9%) males and 239 (59.1%) females. The median age was 66 (59; 72) years old; the patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal epithelial neoplasms.Results: the median size of the removed neoplasms was 3.0 (2.4; 4) cm, tumor was removed en bloc in 324/363 (89.2%) cases; and R0 resection margins were detected in 218/324 (67.3%) cases. Significant risk factors for conversion were: the tumor size ≥ 3.2 cm (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–7.1, p = 0.017), lifting ≤ 3 mm (OR 41, 95% CI 15–105, p = 0.000002) and the tumor vascular pattern IIIa according Sano’s capillary pattern classification (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3–11.9, p = 0.013).Conclusion: endoscopic submucosal dissection is a safe way to remove colorectal neoplasms. However, the presence of conversion risk factors can influence the outcome of endoscopic treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 2959-2965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Sato ◽  
Sayo Ito ◽  
Tomoyuki Kitagawa ◽  
Mitsuru Kato ◽  
Kenji Tominaga ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1587-1594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Jung Lee ◽  
Jae Bum Lee ◽  
Yong Sung Choi ◽  
Suk Hee Lee ◽  
Doo Han Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document