Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

Author(s):  
Ran Li ◽  
Shilun Cai ◽  
Di Sun ◽  
Qiang Shi ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
...  
Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki Okamoto ◽  
Tomohiro Watanabe ◽  
Yoriaki Komeda ◽  
Tatsuya Kono ◽  
Kouta Takashima ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 877-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motomi Terasaki ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Kenjiro Shigita ◽  
Naoki Asayama ◽  
Soki Nishiyama ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. E249-E253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Ohata ◽  
Takashi Muramoto ◽  
Yohei Minato ◽  
Hideyuki Chiba ◽  
Eiji Sakai ◽  
...  

AbstractSince colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains technically difficult, hybrid ESD was developed as an alternative therapeutic option to achieve en bloc resection of relatively large lesions. In this feasibility study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of hybrid colorectal ESD using a newly developed multifunctional snare. From June to August 2016, we prospectively enrolled 10 consecutive patients with non-pedunculated intramucosal colorectal tumors 20 – 30 mm in diameter. All of the hybrid ESD steps were performed using the “SOUTEN” snare. The knob-shaped tip attached to the loop top helps to stabilize the needle-knife, making it less likely to slip during circumferential incision and enables partial submucosal dissection. All of the lesions were curatively resected by hybrid ESD, with a short mean procedure time (16.1 ± 4.8 minutes). The mean diameters of the resected specimens and tumors were 30.5 ± 4.9 and 26.0 ± 3.5 mm, respectively. No perforations occurred, while delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient. In conclusion, hybrid ESD using a multifunctional snare enables easy, safe, and cost-effective resection of relatively large colorectal tumors to be achieved.Study registration: UMIN000022545


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
A. A. Likutov ◽  
D. A. Mtvralashvili ◽  
M. A. Nagudov ◽  
O. M. Yugai ◽  
Yu. E. Vaganov ◽  
...  

Aim: to identify the risk factors for conversion of endoscopic submucosal dissection to abdominal surgery.Patients and methods: the prospective cohort study included 405 patients: 166 (40.9%) males and 239 (59.1%) females. The median age was 66 (59; 72) years old; the patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal epithelial neoplasms.Results: the median size of the removed neoplasms was 3.0 (2.4; 4) cm, tumor was removed en bloc in 324/363 (89.2%) cases; and R0 resection margins were detected in 218/324 (67.3%) cases. Significant risk factors for conversion were: the tumor size ≥ 3.2 cm (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–7.1, p = 0.017), lifting ≤ 3 mm (OR 41, 95% CI 15–105, p = 0.000002) and the tumor vascular pattern IIIa according Sano’s capillary pattern classification (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3–11.9, p = 0.013).Conclusion: endoscopic submucosal dissection is a safe way to remove colorectal neoplasms. However, the presence of conversion risk factors can influence the outcome of endoscopic treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1575-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kagan Coskun ◽  
Mustafa Tahir Ozer ◽  
Sezai Demirbas

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeong Seok Nam ◽  
Cheol Woong Choi ◽  
Su Jin Kim ◽  
Hyung Wook Kim ◽  
Dae Hwan Kang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document