ELECTRE-IDAT for design decision-making problems with interval data and target-based criteria

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Jahan ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 25-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Godaliyadde ◽  
L.B. Godaliyadde ◽  
G. Phylip-Jones ◽  
Z.L. Yang ◽  
A.D. Batako ◽  
...  

AbstractThis article presents a subjective, novel approach to deal with multiple criterion ship design decision making on the basis of interval data. In this novel approach, quantitative interval- and single-valued criteria are modeled and transformed into qualitative criteria by using membership functions of continuous fuzzy sets. Mapping is provided to transform criteria onto a common utility space. All the interval-valued qualitative criteria are transformed by proposing a new algorithm to represent them with a single value for each linguistic term. Normalization is carried out for all the transformed criteria. By combining all the normalized data, an evidential reasoning algorithm is applied to synthesize the generic ship design criteria. Finally, an ER-based utility ranking approach is used to select the ship with the best design criteria on the basis of the risk estimation results of ship hull vibration. The results of this research reveal that the developed approach is suitable for dealing with a ship selection problem based on the risk estimation results of ship hull vibration.


Author(s):  
A. Jahan ◽  
M. Yazdani ◽  
K.L. Edwards

<p>The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is receiving considerable attention as an essential decision analysis technique and becoming a leading method. This paper describes a new version of TOPSIS with interval data and capability to deal with all types of criteria. An improved structure of the TOPSIS is presented to deal with high uncertainty in engineering and engineering decision-making. The proposed Range Target-based Criteria and Interval Data model of TOPSIS (TOPSIS-RTCID) achieves the core contribution in decision making theories through a distinct normalization formula for cost and benefits criteria in scale of point and range target-based values. It is important to notice a very interesting property of the proposed normalization formula being opposite to the usual one. This property can explain why the rank reversal problem is limited. The applicability of the proposed TOPSIS-RTCID method is examined with several empirical litreture’s examples with comparisons, sensitivity analysis, and simulation. The authors have developed a new tool with more efficient, reliable and robust outcomes compared to that from other available tools. The complexity of an engineering design decision problem can be resolved through the development of a well-structured decision making method with multiple attributes. Various decision approches developed for engineering design have neglected elements that should have been taken into account. Through this study, engineering design problems can be resolved with greater reliability and confidence.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2927-2955
Author(s):  
Mar Palmeros Parada ◽  
Lotte Asveld ◽  
Patricia Osseweijer ◽  
John Alexander Posada

AbstractBiobased production has been promoted as a sustainable alternative to fossil resources. However, controversies over its impact on sustainability highlight societal concerns, value tensions and uncertainties that have not been taken into account during its development. In this work, the consideration of stakeholders’ values in a biorefinery design project is investigated. Value sensitive design (VSD) is a promising approach to the design of technologies with consideration of stakeholders’ values, however, it is not directly applicable for complex systems like biorefineries. Therefore, some elements of VSD, such as the identification of relevant values and their connection to a technology’s features, are brought into biorefinery design practice. Midstream modulation (MM), an approach to promoting the consideration of societal aspects during research and development activities, is applied to promote reflection and value considerations during the design decision making. As result, it is shown that MM interventions during the design process led to new design alternatives in support of stakeholders' values, and allowed to recognize and respond to emerging value tensions within the scope of the project. In this way, the present work shows a novel approach for the technical investigation of VSD, especially for biorefineries. Also, based on this work it is argued that not only reflection, but also flexibility and openness are important for the application of VSD in the context of biorefinery design.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Salehi ◽  
Mohammad Izadikhah

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Scott ◽  
Erik K. Antonsson

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Hoffenson ◽  
Rikard Söderberg

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liting Jing ◽  
Junfeng Ma

Abstract With the advancement of new technologies and diverse customer-centered design requirements, the medical device design decision making becomes challenge. Incorporating multiple stakeholders’ requirements into the medical device design will significantly affect the market competitiveness and performance. The classic design decision making approaches mainly focused on design criteria priority determination and conceptual schemes evaluation, which lack the capacity of reflecting the interdependence of interest among stakeholders and capturing the ambiguous influence on the overall design expectations, leading to the unreliable decision making results. In order to relax these constraints in the medical device design, this paper incorporates rough set theory with cooperative game theory model to develop a novel user-centered design decision making framework. The proposed approach is composed of three components: 1) end/professional user needs identification and classification, 2) evaluation criteria correlation diagram and scheme value matrix establishment using rough set theory; and 3) fuzzy coalition utility model development to obtain optimal desirability considering users’ conflict interests. We used a blood pressure meter case study to demonstrate and validate the proposed approach. Compared with the traditional Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach, the proposed approach is more robust.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jackson ◽  
Nathan Mentzer ◽  
Angelika Zissimopoulos

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin K. Peavey ◽  
Jason Zoss ◽  
Nicholas Watkins

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document