A Laboratory Observation on the Acoustic Emission Point Cloud Caused by Hydraulic Fracturing, and the Post-pressure Breakdown Hydraulic Fracturing Re-activation due to Nearby Fault

Author(s):  
Qiquan Xiong ◽  
Jesse C. Hampton
2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (16) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Ishida ◽  
Kazuhei Aoyagi ◽  
Tomoya Niwa ◽  
Youqing Chen ◽  
Sumihiko Murata ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Niemz ◽  
Simone Cesca ◽  
Sebastian Heimann ◽  
Francesco Grigoli ◽  
Sebastian von Specht ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Understanding fracturing processes and the hydromechanical relation to induced seismicity is a key question for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Commonly massive fluid injection, predominately causing hydroshearing, are used in large-scale EGS but also hydraulic fracturing approaches were discussed. To evaluate the applicability of hydraulic fracturing techniques in EGS, six in situ, multistage hydraulic fracturing experiments with three different injection schemes were performed under controlled conditions in crystalline rock at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden). During the experiments the near-field ground motion was continuously recorded by 11 piezoelectric borehole sensors with a sampling rate of 1 MHz. The sensor network covered a volume of 30×30×30 m around a horizontal, 28-m-long injection borehole at a depth of 410 m. To extract and characterize massive, induced, high-frequency acoustic emission (AE) activity from continuous recordings, a semi-automated workflow was developed relying on full waveform based detection, classification and location procedures. The approach extended the AE catalogue from 196 triggered events in previous studies to more than 19 600 located AEs. The enhanced catalogue, for the first time, allows a detailed analysis of induced seismicity during single hydraulic fracturing experiments, including the individual fracturing stages and the comparison between injection schemes. Beside the detailed study of the spatio-temporal patterns, event clusters and the growth of seismic clouds, we estimate relative magnitudes and b-values of AEs for conventional, cyclic progressive and dynamic pulse injection schemes, the latter two being fatigue hydraulic fracturing techniques. While the conventional fracturing leads to AE patterns clustered in planar regions, indicating the generation of a single main fracture plane, the cyclic progressive injection scheme results in a more diffuse, cloud-like AE distribution, indicating the activation of a more complex fracture network. For a given amount of hydraulic energy (pressure multiplied by injected volume) pumped into the system, the cyclic progressive scheme is characterized by a lower rate of seismicity, lower maximum magnitudes and significantly larger b-values, implying an increased number of small events relative to the large ones. To our knowledge, this is the first direct comparison of high resolution seismicity in a mine-scale experiment induced by different hydraulic fracturing schemes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bobrova ◽  
Egor Filev ◽  
Anna Shevtsova ◽  
Sergey Stanchits ◽  
Vladimir Stukachev ◽  
...  

<p>Understanding the processes of Hydraulic Fracturing (HF) initiation and propagation in different types of rocks is important for the design and optimization of HF during the exploitation of underground resources. The main goals were to study the dynamics of the process of hydraulic fracture growth and possible optimization of HF technology for both homogeneous and heterogeneous rocks. Laboratory experiments on HF with different injection parameters were carried out on natural limestone, dolomite and shale specimens. The dynamics of HF process was monitored by Acoustic Emission (AE) technique, on the analogy of induced microseismicity monitoring of HF in the field conditions. The shape of created HF and the size of leak-off zone were analyzed by X-Ray CT scanning technique after the testing.</p><p>Experiments on dolomite were conducted using fluids with different viscosities (1000-10000 cP) injected into the rock with a rate of 0.5 ml/min. In case of low viscosity, we observed low AE activity. After the test, the sample was cut in several pieces transverse to the expected fracture plane. We have found that HF has initiated, but did not reach the sample boundaries and leak-off was significant. The ten times increase of fluid viscosity resulted in significantly increased AE activity, smaller size of leak-off zone and higher breakdown pressure (21.8 against 18.7 MPa). The post-test 3D shape of HF surface obtained by X-Ray CT closely correlates with 3D shape of localized AE events, confirming that the fracture propagated in the direction of maximal stress, as expected. It means that viscosity of fracturing fluid had a significant effect on fracturing breakdown pressure and fracture behavior.</p><p>The influence of different rock types on hydraulic fracturing was studied with dolomite, limestone and shale samples. In case of dolomite and shale, sufficient number of Acoustic Emission events were recorded, which allowed tracing the direction and dynamics of fracture propagation. However, for the limestone, a very small number of AE events were localized with the same parameters of injected fluid. Comparison of dolomite and shale HFs shows that the crack in the shale had a more complex shape, deviating from the maximal stress direction, which was explained by rock heterogeneity, by the presence of natural cracks and inclined planes of weakness. It led us to conclusion that the rock fabric plays an important role in the behavior of hydraulic fracture in heterogeneous rock.</p>


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Maxwell ◽  
Sebastian Goodfellow ◽  
Byungtark Lee ◽  
Mark Mack ◽  
R. Young

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Tiancheng ◽  
Fu Haifeng ◽  
Lu Yongjun ◽  
Liu Yunzhi ◽  
Dou Jingjing ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document