Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederike Schenke ◽  
Marianne Federlin ◽  
Karl-Anton Hiller ◽  
Daniel Moder ◽  
Gottfried Schmalz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Partial Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Ceramic Crowns

scholarly journals Marginal Integrity of Partial Ceramic Crowns Within Dentin With Different Luting Techniques and Materials

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schenke ◽  
K-A. Hiller ◽  
G. Schmalz ◽  
M. Federlin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
The Self ◽  
The Other ◽  
Adhesive Material ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
Resin Coating ◽  
Partial Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Composite Interface ◽  
Ceramic Crowns

Clinical Relevance Resin coating improves the marginal seal of partial ceramic crowns to dentin compared to conventional luting, especially at the dentin/composite interface. However, the self-adhesive material RelyX Unicem shows significantly better marginal integrity than the other materials tested.

Microleakage of All-ceramic Crowns Using Self-etching Resin Luting Agents

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Trajtenberg ◽  
S. J. Caram ◽  
S. Kiat-amnuay
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
The Self ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Die Spacer

Clinical Relevance Among the self-adhesive resin cements, Panavia F 2.0 demonstrated less microleakage than RelyX Unicem or Multilink, whether or not a die spacer technique was used.

Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Zarauz ◽  
Arelhys Valverde ◽  
Francisco Martinez-Rus ◽  
Bassam Hassan ◽  
Guillermo Pradies
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Crowns

Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Byeong-Hoon Cho ◽  
Jin-Hee Lee ◽  
Soo-Jung Kwon ◽  
Young-Ah Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Ceramic Thickness ◽  
Preparation Design

Partial Ceramic Crowns: Influence of Ceramic Thickness, Preparation Design and Luting Material on Fracture Resistance and Marginal Integrity In Vitro

10.2341/06-70 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Federlin ◽  
S. Krifka ◽  
M. Herpich ◽  
K-A. Hiller ◽  
G. Schmalz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Adhesively Bonded ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
Partial Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Ceramic Thickness ◽  
Preparation Design ◽  
Luting Material

Clinical Relevance For fracture resistance and the marginal integrity of adhesively bonded partial ceramic crowns (PCC), the choice of ceramic thickness and luting material are more important than preparation design. PCC fabricated from industrially sintered feldspathic ceramic should have at least a thickness of 1.5–2.0 mm in stress bearing areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document