Partial Ceramic Crowns: Influence of Ceramic Thickness, Preparation Design and Luting Material on Fracture Resistance and Marginal Integrity In Vitro

10.2341/06-70 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Federlin ◽  
S. Krifka ◽  
M. Herpich ◽  
K-A. Hiller ◽  
G. Schmalz

Clinical Relevance For fracture resistance and the marginal integrity of adhesively bonded partial ceramic crowns (PCC), the choice of ceramic thickness and luting material are more important than preparation design. PCC fabricated from industrially sintered feldspathic ceramic should have at least a thickness of 1.5–2.0 mm in stress bearing areas.

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schenke ◽  
K-A. Hiller ◽  
G. Schmalz ◽  
M. Federlin

Clinical Relevance Resin coating improves the marginal seal of partial ceramic crowns to dentin compared to conventional luting, especially at the dentin/composite interface. However, the self-adhesive material RelyX Unicem shows significantly better marginal integrity than the other materials tested.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2745-2754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Blunck ◽  
Sabine Fischer ◽  
Jan Hajtó ◽  
Stefan Frei ◽  
Roland Frankenberger

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Byeong-Hoon Cho ◽  
Jin-Hee Lee ◽  
Soo-Jung Kwon ◽  
Young-Ah Yi ◽  
...  

10.2341/08-34 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Krifka ◽  
T. Anthofer ◽  
M. Fritzsch ◽  
K-A. Hiller ◽  
G. Schmalz ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance The minimum effective thickness of cusp walls with adhesively bonded ceramic restorations is not yet defined. According to this in vitro study, a cusp wall thickness of at least 2.0 mm at the base is recommended.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 510-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Oskoee ◽  
P. A. Oskoee ◽  
E. J. Navimipour ◽  
S. Shahi

Clinical Relevance Horizontal pins alone, or with flowable composite, have no effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars restored with resin composite.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilser Turkyilmaz ◽  
Suat Gokce ◽  
Emine Celik-Bagci

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of three different thicknesses of In-Ceram core on the load at fracture of all-ceramic crowns. Methods and Materials Thirty standardized crown-shaped nickel-chromium alloy dies were fabricated using a milling machine. Twenty dies were prepared with a 1 mm shoulder for Groups A and B. The only difference in the ten dies used for Group C was a smaller 0.5 mm lingual shoulder. The thicknesses of In-Ceram were 0.5 mm, 1.5 mm, and 0.75 mm for Groups A, B, and C. All all-ceramic crowns were fabricated in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. After cementation of the crowns, their fracture resistance was tested with a universal testing machine. The load was directed to a point located 3 mm from the lingual aspect of the incisal edge at 30 degrees to the long axis of each specimen until catastrophic failure occurred. Results The mean loads at fracture for Groups A, B, and C were 1117±388 N, 2083±385 N, and 1439±368 N, respectively. No statistically significant difference in load at fracture between Groups A and C was found (p>0.05). However, the differences were statistically significant between Groups A and B (p<0.001) and Groups B and C (p<0.001). Conclusion Under the guidelines of this study, increasing the thickness of the In-Ceram core increased the fracture resistance of the all-ceramic crowns. Clinical Significance The sufficient thickness of the In-Ceram core of all-ceramic crowns is an important factor in fracture resistance. Therefore, dental practitioners should be careful in patient selection; if the horizontal overlap of a tooth to be restored is too limited, then all-ceramic crowns may not be a feasible option. Citation Gokce S, Celik-Bagci E, Turkyilmaz I. A Comparative in vitro Study of the Load at Fracture of Allceramic Crowns with Various Thicknesses of In-Ceram Core. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 May; (9)4:017-025.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Katerina Zlatanovska ◽  
Ljuben Guguvcevski ◽  
Risto Popovski ◽  
Cena Dimova ◽  
Ana Minovska ◽  
...  

Summary Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the fracture load of composite veneers using three different preparation designs. Material and methods: Fifteen extracted, intact, human maxillary central incisors were selected. Teeth were divided into three groups with different preparation design: 1) feather preparation, 2) bevel preparation, and 3) incisal overlap- palatal chamfer. Teeth were restored with composite veneers, and the specimens were loaded to failure. The localization of the fracture was recorded as incisal, gingival or combined. Results: Composite veneers with incisal overlap - palatal chamfer showed higher fracture resistance compared to feather preparation and bevel preparation. The mean (SD) fracture loads were: Group 1: 100.6±8.0 N, Group 2: 107.4±6.8 N, and Group 3: 122.0±8.8 N. The most common mode of failure was debonding for veneers with feather preparation and fracture when incisal edge is reduced. The most frequent localization of fracture was incisal. Conclusion: The type of preparation has a significant effect on fracture load for composite veneers. This study indicates that using an incisal overlap- palatal chamfer preparation design significantly increases the fracture resistance compared to feather and bevel preparation designs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document