Effect of Thermocycling on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements Used for Luting CAD/CAM Ceramics to Human Dentin

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive, self-etching resin cements luted to human dentin and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics. Three modern self-adhesive dental cements (Maxcem Elite, RelyX U200, Panavia SA) were used to lute three CAD/CAM ceramics (IPS Empress CAD, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.max ZirCAD) onto the dentin. One conventional cement (Panavia V5) served as a control. After preparation, the samples were subjected to thermocycling as a method of artificial aging of dental materials applied to simulate long-term use in oral conditions. Shear bond strength was evaluated according to PN-EN ISO 29022:2013-10 and failure modes were observed under a light microscope. Statistical analysis was performed. The study demonstrated that a combination of ceramics and cements directly impacts the bond strength. The highest bond strength was observed in Panavia V5, lower in Panavia SA and Maxcem Elite and the lowest–in RelyX U200. Adhesive failure between human dentin and cements was the most common failure mode. Moreover, thermocycling highly decreased bond strength of self-adhesive, self-etching cements.

Comparison of Bond Strength in the Different Class of Resin Cements to Cast and CAD/CAM Co-Cr Alloys

Objectives. Despite the widespread use of resin cements in cementing dental restorations, their bond strength to CAD/CAM base metal alloys is not widely studied. This study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) between cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloys fabricated using casting or CAD/CAM methods with three types of resin cements. Materials and Methods. Fifty Co-Cr blocks were prepared with CAD/CAM or casting technique. Specimens were divided using primer or not and bonded to three types of resin cements: Panavia F2, RelyX Unicem, and Duo-Link. The differences between the mean μSBS values were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA test and Tukey analysis (α = 0.05). The mode of failure was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. In addition, the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) based on two received signals: backscattered electrons (SEB) and secondary electrons (SEs). One intact alloy specimen in each group was analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Results. Most of the specimens in the no-primer group were prematurely debonded. Statistical analyses showed that the interaction between the alloy substrate and cement type was significant ( p = 0.001 ). The bond strength of Panavia F2 was significantly higher than Duo-Link in the CAD/CAM group ( p = 0.001 ). SEM evaluation confirmed the difference in grain structures, while EDX showed no remarkable difference in the chemical composition of the alloy substrates. Conclusion. Alloy fabrication technique may influence the bond strength of resin cements. In the CAD/CAM group, cement containing MDP molecules exhibited higher strength than the etch-and-rinse one.

Polymer-Based Bioactive Luting Agents for Cementation of All-Ceramic Crowns: An SEM, EDX, Microleakage, Fracture Strength, and Color Stability Study

The aim of the study was to compare microleakage and fracture loads of all ceramic crowns luted with conventional polymer resins and polymeric bioactive cements and to assess the color stability of polymeric bioactive cements. Seventy-five extracted premolar teeth were tested for fracture loads and microleakage in all-ceramic crowns cemented with two types of polymeric bioactive cements and resin cements. In addition, the degree of color change for each cement with coffee was assessed. Thirty maxillary premolar teeth for fracture loads and thirty mandibular premolar teeth for microleakage were prepared; standardized teeth preparations were performed by a single experienced operator. All prepared specimens were randomly distributed to three groups (n = 20) based on the type of cement, Group 1: resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: polymeric bioactive cement (ACTIVA); Group 3: polymeric bioactive cement (Ceramir). The cementation procedures for all cements (Multilink, ACTIVA, and Ceramir) were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. All specimens were aged using thermocycling for 30,000 cycles (5–55 °C, dwell time 30 s). These specimens were tested using the universal testing machine for fracture strength and with a micro-CT for microleakage. For the color stability evaluation, the cement specimens were immersed in coffee and evaluated with a spectrometer. Results: The highest and lowest means for fracture loads were observed in resin cements (49.5 ± 8.85) and Ceramir (39.8 ± 9.16), respectively. Ceramir (2.563 ± 0.71) showed the highest microleakage compared to resin (0.70 ± 0.75) and ACTIVA (0.61 ± 0.56). ACTIVA cements showed comparable fracture loads, microleakage, and stain resistance compared to resin cements.