The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 1281-1286
Author(s):  
Omid Dianat ◽  
Mohamad Ali Mozayeni ◽  
Mohammad Karim Layeghnejad ◽  
Shiva Shojaeian
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Molars ◽  
Buccal Infiltration ◽  
Irreversible Pulpitis ◽  
Infiltration Anesthesia

scholarly journals Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration in the urgency treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e32910514651
Author(s):  
Marcelo Capitanio ◽  
Izabela Volpato Marques Tookuni ◽  
Nair Narumi Orita Pavan ◽  
Isolde Terezinha Santos Previdelli ◽  
Angélica Nascimento dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Mandibular Molars ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Buccal Infiltration ◽  
Irreversible Pulpitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of the 4% articaine by the buccal infiltration technique (BI) after inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine, in the urgency treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP). This was a prospective study, with a randomized, blinded, controlled parallel clinical trial experimental design. Thirty patients diagnosed with SIP were randomly assigned, and the control group (G1) received the IANB with 1.8 mL of mepivacaine while the experimental group (G2) also received a supplemental BI with 1.8 mL of articaine. To evaluate the anesthetic efficacy, in addition to lip numbness test, the electric pulp testing (EPT) was used. Additionally, a visual analogue scale verified the presence of pain. Two-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were applied at a significance level of 5%. There was a reduction in pain perception after the two techniques (p<0.001), with no difference between groups (p=0.479). The anesthetic efficacy was 26.6% for IANB (G1) and 40% for IANB plus BI (G2), without significant difference between the two treatments (p=0.699). The BI with 4% articaine after IANB with 2% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine, did not significantly increase anesthetic success in patients with SIP.

Articaine and Lidocaine Mandibular Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Dib Kanaa ◽  
John Martin Whitworth ◽  
Ian Porter Corbett ◽  
John Gerard Meechan
Keyword(s):  
Double Blind ◽  
Buccal Infiltration ◽  
Infiltration Anesthesia

The Effect of Maxillary First Molar Root Length on the Success Rate of Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1462-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Moradi Askari ◽  
Masoud Parirokh ◽  
Nouzar Nakhaee ◽  
Hamid Reza Hosseini ◽  
Paul V. Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Root Length ◽  
Buccal Infiltration ◽  
Infiltration Anesthesia
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document