scholarly journals Worst-case execution-time analysis for embedded real-time systems

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Engblom ◽  
Andreas Ermedahl ◽  
Mikael Sjödin ◽  
Jan Gustafsson ◽  
Hans Hansson
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Junia Santillo Costa ◽  
Romulo Silva de Oliveira ◽  
Luis Fernando Arcaro

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevil Serttaş ◽  
Veysel Harun Şahin

Real-time systems are widely used from the automotive industry to the aerospace industry. The scientists, researchers, and engineers who develop real-time platforms, worst-case execution time analysis methods and tools need to compare their solutions to alternatives. For this purpose, they use benchmark applications. Today many of our computing systems are multicore and/or multiprocessor systems. Therefore, to be able to compare the effectiveness of real-time platforms, worst-case execution time analysis methods and tools, the research community need multi-threaded benchmark applications which scale on multicore and/or multiprocessor systems. In this paper, we present the first version of PBench, a parallel, real-time benchmark suite. PBench includes different types of multi-threaded applications which implement various algorithms from searching to sorting, matrix multiplication to probability distribution calculation. In addition, PBench provides single-threaded versions of all programs to allow side by side comparisons.


Author(s):  
Laurent George ◽  
Pierre Courbin

In this chapter the authors focus on the problem of reconfiguring embedded real-time systems. Such reconfiguration can be decided either off-line to determine if a given application can be run on a different platform, while preserving the timeliness constraints imposed by the application, or on-line, where a reconfiguration should be done to adapt the system to the context of execution or to handle hardware or software faults. The task model considered in this chapter is the classical sporadic task model defined by a Worst Case Execution Time (WCET), a minimum inter-arrival time (also denoted the minimum Period) and a late termination deadline. The authors consider two preemptive scheduling strategies: Fixed Priority highest priority first (FP) and Earliest Deadline First (EDF). They propose a sensitivity analysis to handle reconfiguration issues. Sensitivity analysis aims at determining acceptable deviations from the specifications of a problem due to evolutions in system characteristics (reconfiguration or performance tuning). They present a state of the art for sensitivity analysis in the case of WCETs, Periods and Deadlines reconfigurations and study to what extent sensitivity analysis can be used to decide on the possibility of reconfiguring a system.


Author(s):  
Fanqi Meng ◽  
Xiaohong Su ◽  
Zhaoyang Qu

Worst case execution time (WCET) analysis is essential for exposing timeliness defects when developing hard real-time systems. However, it is too late to fix timeliness defects cheaply since developers generally perform WCET analysis in a final verification phase. To help developers quickly identify real timeliness defects in an early programming phase, a novel interactive WCET prediction with warning for timeout risk is proposed. The novelty is that the approach not only fast estimates WCET based on a control flow tree (CFT), but also assesses the estimated WCET with a trusted level by a lightweight false path analysis. According to the trusted levels, corresponding warnings will be triggered once the estimated WCET exceeds a preset safe threshold. Hence developers can identify real timeliness defects more timely and efficiently. To this end, we first analyze the reasons of the overestimation of CFT-based WCET calculation; then we propose a trusted level model of timeout risks; for recognizing the structural patterns of timeout risks, we develop a risk data counting algorithm; and we also give some tactics for applying our approach more effectively. Experimental results show that our approach has almost the same running speed compared with the fast and interactive WCET analysis, but it saves more time in identifying real timeliness defects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document