Abstract
Introduction/Objective
Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) is a biomarker for the evaluation of growth hormone activity in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. The current most common methodology for IGF-1 measurement is automated immunometric assays. In this study, we compared the IGF-1 on Siemens Immulite 2000, DiaSorin Liaison XL and IDS iSYS.
Methods/Case Report
Residual 30-110 serum specimens were randomly selected from routine hospital orders. IGF- 1 was measured on these three platforms and compared with Passing-Bablok regression. Bias was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method.
Results (if a Case Study enter NA)
Weighted Deming regression analysis showed approximately 80% and 56% positive bias on IDS iSYS and DiaSorin Liaison, compared with Siemens Immulite (iSYS=1.81*Immulite-117.65, r=0.91; Liaison=1.56*Immulite-4.58, r=0.98). There was approximately 8% positive bias on Liaison, compared with iSYS (Liaison=1.08*iSYS+0.56, r=0.99). The Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed approximately 67% and 54% positive bias (iSYS=1.67*Immulite-75, r=0.91; Liaison=1.54*Immulite-3.44, r=0.91). Approximately 8% positive bias on Liaison was observed, compared with iSYS (Liaison=1.08*iSYS+5.65, r=0.99). The Bland-Altman plot showed the agreement between iSYS and Immulite IGF-1 was on average 129.6±123.3 ng/mL, 98.6±148.8 ng/mL between Liaison and Immulite and 37.0±46.5 ng/mL between Liaison and iSYS.
Conclusion
Immunoassays rely on the specificity of antibodies. There are wide variations between different immunoassay platforms for IGF-1 measurement. The standardization of IGF-1 assay is lack. It would be a challenge for clinicians to monitor IGF-1 or treat the patients with pituitary disorders, when switching to another platform. The potential impact of the variations in IGF-1 measurement between different immunoassay platforms should be aware.
Repeated Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Treatment in a Patient with Rett Syndrome: A Single Case Study