Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic approach, especially laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) for inguinal hernia (IH) is widely spread but few studies have compared its invasiveness with that of conventional approach (POTTS). This study compared the role and invasiveness of LPEC with POTTS at our institute.
Material and methods
The records of 940 IH patients from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed on the basis of age, sex, method of surgery, pre- and post-operative diagnosis, postoperative symptoms, and complications.
Results
The POTTS group comprised 393 males, of which 44 were diagnosed with contralateral hernia (7.1%). In the LPEC group, 158 males had an average age of 3.88 years. The contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV) was identified in 148 patients during operation. POTTS operation time for patients aged < 1 year was 42.7 minutes, vs 33.4 minutes for LPEC. The two groups experienced comparable paces of fever and first oral intake time; however, pain and recurrence rate were greater in the LPEC group.
Conclusion
LPEC can be performed to avoid contralateral recurrences; surgical time is reduced for patients aged < 1 year. However, the reduced invasiveness of LPEC compared to that of POTTS did not minimize postoperative symptoms or complications.
The meaning of laparoscopic procedure against inguinal hernia
