Abdominal wound dehiscence is dangerous: a nationwide study of 14,169 patients undergoing elective open resection for colonic cancer

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Jensen ◽  
E. Oma ◽  
G. H. van Ramshorst ◽  
A. Nordholm-Carstensen ◽  
P.-M. Krarup
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Siddique Ammar ◽  
Syed Asghar Naqi ◽  
Shehrbano Khattak ◽  
Ahmed Raza Noumani

Objective: To assess the role of abdominal binder in patients with midline wound dehiscence after elective or emergency laparotomy in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure. Methods: It was a comparative study done at EAST Surgical Ward of Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2019. One hundred and sixty-two (162) patients were included in this study with post-operative midline abdominal wound dehiscence and after informed consent by consecutive non probability sampling technique. Patients were divided into two groups by lottery method into eighty-one patients each. Group-A included patients where abdominal binder was applied and Group-B included patients without abdominal binder. In both groups pain score, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure was assessed and compared. Results: Patients with abdominal binder shows significantly less pain (P value =0.000) and more psychological satisfaction (P value = 0.000) as compared to the patients where abdominal binder was not used. However, there was no difference in reducing the need for reclosure in patients who use abdominal binder (P value = 0.063). Conclusion: Although abdominal binder helps in reducing the pain and improving the psychological satisfaction in patients with midline abdominal wound dehiscence yet it doesn’t help in healing of wound and reclosure of the dehisced abdominal wound is needed. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3671 How to cite this:Ammar AS, Naqi SA, Khattak S, Noumani AR. Outcome of abdominal binder in midline abdominal wound Dehiscence in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):1118-1121.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3671 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 385-386
Author(s):  
Fedele Lembo ◽  
Liberato Roberto Cecchino ◽  
Domenico Parisi ◽  
Aurelio Portincasa

2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 1188-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel de Vooght ◽  
Guy Feruzi ◽  
Roger Detry ◽  
Jan Lerut ◽  
Romain Vanwijck

BMJ ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 2 (5245) ◽  
pp. 173-173
Author(s):  
H. A. Kidd

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kihara ◽  
S Kasamaki ◽  
T Kamano ◽  
K Sakamoto ◽  
Y Tomiki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document