Subjective visual vertical in virtual reality (Curator SVV): validation and normative data

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elodie Chiarovano ◽  
Leigh A. McGarvie ◽  
David Szmulewicz ◽  
Hamish G. MacDougall
Medicina ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 394-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrida Ulozienė ◽  
Milda Totilienė ◽  
Andrius Paulauskas ◽  
Tomas Blažauskas ◽  
Vaidotas Marozas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos� Negrillo ◽  
Antonio J. Rueda ◽  
Carlos J. Ogayar ◽  
Rafael Lomas ◽  
Rafael J. Segura

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Negrillo-Cárdenas ◽  
Antonio J. Rueda-Ruiz ◽  
Carlos J. Ogayar-Anguita ◽  
Rafael Lomas-Vega ◽  
Rafael J. Segura-Sánchez

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (07) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith W. Akin ◽  
Owen D. Murnane ◽  
Amber Pearson ◽  
Stephanie Byrd ◽  
J. Kip Kelly

Background: The otoliths act as gravito-inertial force sensors and contribute to the perception of spatial orientation. The perception of gravitational vertical can be assessed by asking a subject to adjust a light bar to the vertical. Prior to clinical use of the SVV (subjective visual vertical) test, normative data and test-retest reliability must be established. Purpose: To obtain normative data and d etermine the test-retest reliability for the SVV test performed in static and dynamic test conditions. Research Design: A descriptive design was used to obtain normative data. Study Sample: Twenty-four young adults with no history of neurological disease, middle-ear pathology, open or closed head injury, cervical injury, or audiovestibular disorder participated in the study. Data Collection and Analysis: The SVV angle was measured in the static position and in three dynamic conditions: (1) on-axis clockwise (CW) rotation, (2) off-axis CW rotation of right ear, and (3) off-axis CW rotation of left ear. Results: In young healthy individuals, the SVV was <2° for static and on-axis rotation, and shifted up to 11° during unilateral centrifugation. Test-retest reliability of the SVV was good for all test conditions. Conclusions: The normative data obtained in this study may be useful in identifying patients with chronic utricular dysfunction. We recommend the use of difference angles (on-axis SVV – off-axis SVV) to remove baseline bias and decrease the variability of the SVV angles for the off-axis conditions.


Neurology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 82 (22) ◽  
pp. 1968-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.-H. Yang ◽  
S.-Y. Oh ◽  
K. Kwak ◽  
J.-M. Lee ◽  
B.-S. Shin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Funabashi ◽  
Natya N.L. Silva ◽  
Luciana M. Watanabe ◽  
Taiza E.G Santos-Pontelli ◽  
José Fernando Colafêmina ◽  
...  

Subjective visual vertical (SVV) evaluates the individual's capacity to determine the vertical orientation. Using a neck brace (NB) allow volunteers' heads fixation to reduce cephalic tilt during the exam, preventing compensatory ocular torsion and erroneous influence on SVV result. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of somatosensory inputs caused by a NB on the SVV. METHOD: Thirty healthy volunteers performed static and dynamic SVV: six measures with and six without the NB. RESULTS: The mean values for static SVV were -0.075º±1.15º without NB and -0.372º±1.21º with NB. For dynamic SVV in clockwise direction were 1.73º±2.31º without NB and 1.53º±1.80º with NB. For dynamic SVV in counterclockwise direction was -1.50º±2.44º without NB and -1.11º±2.46º with NB. Differences between measurements with and without the NB were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the neck has many sensory receptors, the use of a NB does not provide sufficient afferent input to change healthy subjects' perception of visual verticality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document