Variability of the engineering properties of rock masses quantified by the geological strength index: the case of ophiolites with special emphasis on tunnelling

2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Marinos ◽  
E. Hoek ◽  
V. Marinos
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 29-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Laxmi Singh ◽  
Naresh Kazi Tamrakar

The rock slopes of the Thopal-Malekhu River areas, Lesser Himalaya, were characterized applying various systems of rock mass classification, such as Rock mass Rating (RMR) and Geological Strength Index (GSI), because the study area comprises well exposed rock formations of the Nawakot and Kathmandu Complexes, across the Thopal-Malekhu River areas. In RMR system, mainly five parameters viz. Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) of rock, Rock Quality Designation (RQD), spacing of discontinuity, condition of discontinuity, and groundwater condition were considered. The new GSI charts, which were suitable for schistose and much disintegrated rock masses, were used to characterize rock slopes based on quantitative analysis of the rock mass structure and surface condition of discontinuities. RMR ranged from 36 to 82 (poor to very good rock mass) and GSI from 13.5±3 to 58±3 (poor to good rock mass). Slates (of the Benighat Slate) are poor rock masses with low strength, very poor RQD, and close to very close spacing of discontinuity, and dolomites (Dhading Dolomite) are fair rocks with disintegrated, poorly interlocked, and heavily broken rock masses yielding very low RMR and GSI values. Phyllites (Dandagaun Phyllite), schist (Robang Formation) and quartzite (Fagfog Quartzite, Robang Formation and Chisapani Quartzite), dolomite (Malekhu Limestone), and metasandstone (Tistung Formation) are fair rock masses with moderate GSI and RMR values, whereas quartzose schist and gneiss (Kulekhani Formation) are very good rock masses having comparatively higher RMR and GSI. The relationship between GSI and RMR shows positive and good degree of correlation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/bdg.v16i0.8882   Bulletin of the Department of Geology Vol. 16, 2013, pp. 29-42


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.35) ◽  
pp. 819
Author(s):  
R Roslan ◽  
RC Omar ◽  
I.N.Z. Baharuddin ◽  
Hairin Taha ◽  
M.M. Fared ◽  
...  

Segari - Ayer Tawar rock materials were generally characterized as slightly weathered (Grade II) to moderately weathered (Grade III).  Laboratory tests such as Brazilian tensile strength and point load strength index including direct shear strength were carried out using collected weathering sample from borehole to assess the rock strength. Hence, index testing was used to predict geological strength index, rock failure criterion from Hoek-Brown and deformation modulus mainly for the classification of rock mass engineering properties.  The relationship between the uniaxial compressive strength and geological strength index of rocks were used in proposing suitable methods for cutting the rock slope.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
Xiaohu Huang ◽  
Changming Wang ◽  
Tianzuo Wang ◽  
Zhiming Zhang

2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Β. Μαρίνος ◽  
Π. Μαρίνος ◽  
E. Hoek

After one decade of application of the Geological Strength Index, GSI, and its extensions, in the quantitative characterisation of the rock mass, the present paper attempts to answer the questions that have been raised by the users about the determination of the GSI for various qualities of rock masses and various conditions. Recommendations are given and cases are discussed where GSI is not applicable. The paper also gives general guidance on the field of GSI values of rock masses for the most common rock types based on their pétrographie and their most usual structural characteristics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document