Tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Akin ◽  
Faik Tugut ◽  
Umit Guney ◽  
Omer Kirmali ◽  
Turker Akar
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Soft Denture Liner

Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Akin ◽  
Faik Tugut ◽  
Burcu Mutaf ◽  
Gulsah Akin ◽  
A. Kemal Ozdemir
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Soft Denture Liner

The Effect of Surface Treatments on Tensile Bond Strength between a Silicone Soft Liner and a Heat-Cured Denture Base Resin

2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 951-965
Author(s):  
Koray Soygun ◽  
Giray Bolayir ◽  
Arife Dogan ◽  
Hakan Demir ◽  
Orhan Murat Dogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Denture Base Resin ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Soft Liners to an Acrylic Resin Denture Base with Various Curing Methods and Surface Treatments

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Haghi ◽  
Masoud Shiehzadeh ◽  
Jafar Gharechahi ◽  
Davood Nodehi ◽  
Asad Karazhian
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Curing Methods

scholarly journals Improvement in the Tensile Bond Strength between 3Y-TZP Ceramic and Enamel by Surface Treatments

Materials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seon-Mi Byeon ◽  
Yong-Seok Jang ◽  
Min-Ho Lee ◽  
Tae-Sung Bae
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength

scholarly journals Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of non-precious alloy‒ceramic interface: An SEM study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207
Author(s):  
Vikram M. Belkhode ◽  
Sharayu V. Nimonkar ◽  
S. R. Godbole ◽  
Pranali Nimonkar ◽  
Seema Sathe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Surface Grinding ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Dental Porcelain ◽  
Surface Irregularities ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background. Dental porcelain has excellent esthetics in combination with biocompatibility and is one of the most commonly used restorative materials. Its low tensile strength remains a major drawback. The porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations have been introduced to increase the fracture resistance of dental porcelain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a non-precious alloy to ceramic. Methods. The present cross-sectional observational study was conducted with forty samples of cobalt‒chromium that were fabricated with porcelain interposed between the two metal test pieces. The metal was subjected to combinations of different surface treatments. The samples group A (n=10) were not subjected to any surface treatments. Group B samples underwent sandblasting and surface grinding. Group C samples were subjected to sandblasting, surface grinding and degassing; and group D samples underwent sandblasting, surface grinding, ultrasonic cleaning and degassing. The tensile bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to obtain images of the samples after surface treatment to determine the surface irregularities and after the debonding of the samples for the type of the bond failure. ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. Results. The results showed significant variations in the tensile bond strength between the four groups (F=251.05, P=0.000). The SEM images of group A showed no surface irregularities; group C samples exhibited surface irregularities more than those in group B. Group D had the highest surface irregularities. SEM evaluations showed a statistically significant difference in the type of bond failure (P<0.001). Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the surface treatments on the metal increased the bond strength of the metal‒ceramic interface significantly. A combination of sandblasting, surface grinding and ultrasonic cleaning, followed by degassing, resulted in the highest tensile bond strength.

Effect of different mechanical surface treatments on bond strength of acrylic teeth to polyamide denture base

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 3519-3523
Author(s):  
Alaa Soliman ◽  
Mohamed Elgendy ◽  
Mohamed El-Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Mechanical Surface

Bond strength of soft liners to denture base resins and the influence of different surface treatments and thermocycling: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 800-806.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byrasandra Channappa Muddugangadhar ◽  
Dipal P. Mawani ◽  
Arindam Das ◽  
Arindam Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Denture Base
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document