scholarly journals Preference uncertainty as an explanation of anomalies in contingent valuation: coastal management in the UK

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 2203-2215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg S. Smith ◽  
Brett H. Day ◽  
Ian J. Bateman
2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Horton ◽  
Giordano Colarullo ◽  
Ian J. Bateman ◽  
Carlos A. Peres

Contingent valuation (CV) is a popular method in economics for eliciting individuals' preferences for non-market environmental resources, but very few attempts have been made to apply it to distant environmental goods of global importance. This paper reports the results of a CV study in the UK and Italy, which evaluated non-users' willingness to pay for the implementation of a proposed programme of protected areas in Brazilian Amazonia. The main focus of the survey was the wealth of biodiversity in the region proposed for protection and the ecosystem services provided by such areas. Taking both countries together, respondents were willing to pay, on average, £30 (US$ 45.60) per household per annum to fund the implementation of a protection programme covering 5% of Brazilian Amazonia and £39 (US$ 59.28) per household per annum to fund a 20% programme. Aggregated across households, an annual fund to conserve 5% of Brazilian Amazonia as strictly protected areas could yield around £600 million (US$ 912 million) in the UK and a similar amount in Italy. It should be noted that respondents appeared to show a high degree of uncertainty in the bid decision process for such an unfamiliar and distant good, leading to questions as to the validity and reliability of results. Nevertheless, responses were non-random and systematically related to a range of socio-economic characteristics and attitudinal variables. Thus initiatives such as international financial transfers from wealthy developed countries to support the protection of threatened areas of global significance could attract widespread support in those countries.


2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Akter ◽  
Jeff Bennett ◽  
Sanzida Akhter

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Pethick ◽  
Stephen Crooks

Sustainable coastal resource management requires the safeguarding and transmission to future generations of a level and quality of natural resources that will provide an ongoing yield of economic and environmental services. All maritime nations are approaching this goal with different issues in mind. The UK, which has a long history of development and flood protection in coastal areas, has chosen to adopt shoreline management, rather than coastal management, so placing coastal defence above all else as its primary and statutory objective. This paper aims to provide a geomorphological perspective of long-term coastal evolution and seeks to compare the UK approach with wider interpretations of coastal management. Based on a literature review, it is argued that coastal management (CM) and shoreline management, as a subset of CM, should share the same ultimate objectives, which are defined by many authorities as sustainable use. The objectives, both strategic and pragmatic, which follow from such an aim may appear to conflict with a reading of many of the texts for international and national CM or designated area management which emphasizes stability rather than sustainability. The result is that coastal defence is seen not merely as a means to an end but as an end in itself. It is argued within this paper that sustainable use of the coast, however, demands both spatial and temporal flexibility of its component systems, and management for change must therefore be the primary objective. Response of the natural system to independent forcing factors must be encouraged under this objective, whether such forces are natural or anthropogenic. In achieving such an objective the concept of shoreline vulnerability may prove useful. A simple and preliminary Vulnerability Index is proposed, relating disturbance event frequency to relaxation time (the time taken for the coastal feature to recover its form). This index provides a first order approximation of the temporal variability that may be expected in landform components of the shoreline system, so allowing management to provide more realistic objectives for long-term sustainability in response to both natural and artificial forces.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Lee ◽  
Rowan Vernon ◽  
Chris Williams ◽  
Andres Payo Garcia ◽  
Jonathan Lee

<p>Coastal erosion and flooding are an increasing issue in Great Britain and pose a significant threat to people living and working in coastal environments, as well as the associated threats to infrastructure and assets. Recent storms, including Storm Callum in 2018, Storm Frank in 2014 and the east coast tidal surge in 2013, have highlighted these issues and caused widespread flooding, power outages and travel disruption. Repairs to homes, buildings, infrastructure and coastal defences cost tens of millions of pounds and took several months to complete with disruption to life, livelihoods and the national economy continuing long after the events.  </p><p>The geomorphological variability of Great Britain’s ca. 11,000 mile long coastline, from steep, hard cliffs to weak, easily erodible cliffs and wide flat estuaries, is challenging to represent and therefore consider in a modelling environment. Consequently, the variability, particularly in cliff geology, lithology and rock properties, is often under-represented in coastal modelling and coastal management planning. This results in potentially critical factors such as cliff complexity (e.g. multiple lithologies, jointing and bedding structures, permeability), cliff morphology, and the coastal buffer, being overlooked, all of which can influence the way coastal landforms respond to changing climatic drivers. Finding an accessible, objective and multi-scaled way of communicating this variability to a wide range of coastal practitioners is important in helping to address coastal vulnerability and increase resilience regionally and nationally.</p><p>Using a novel partitional clustering approach, we have developed a new classification system for the coastline of Great Britain, which divides the coastline into specific domains based on a range of physical variables. This method combines data available from the existing BGS Coastal Vulnerability Dataset which includes geology type, cliff strength, foreshore environment and inundation potential. In addition, open source datasets, including wave power and height, tide height and tidal current speed, have been incorporated. The datasets have been attributed to ca. 4 million transects at 5 m intervals along the coastline. Effective multivariate clustering data driven techniques, with expert assessment, have been used to cluster the dataset in an iterative way. This approach enables the capture of the thoughts and processes that we as geomorphologists consider when comparing one coastal area with another and will provide a tool for communicating variability in the coast and its resilience to erosion and flooding.</p><p>This is the first time such a method has been applied nationally in Great Britain and will provide a potential new benchmark for describing the GB coastline and the changes that it may be subject to. The resulting coastal domains dataset will soon be made available to practitioners in the UK and will assist in making more informed decisions when considering coastal management.</p>


1998 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 269 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kerry Turner ◽  
Irene Lorenzoni ◽  
Nicola Beaumont ◽  
Ian J. Bateman ◽  
Ian H. Langford ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Victoria Clipsham ◽  
Jaap Flikweert ◽  
Chris Adnitt ◽  
Gökhan Doygun ◽  
Gerard Spaan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document