scholarly journals Stronger Versions of Sensitivity for Minimal Group Actions

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1933-1946
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Yi Ni Yang
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 333 ◽  
pp. 1004-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Glasner ◽  
Yonatan Gutman ◽  
XiangDong Ye

Author(s):  
I. M. Chiswell

We consider the existence and uniqueness of minimal invariant subtrees for abelian actions of groups on Λ-trees, and whether or not a minimal action is determined up to isomorphism by the hyperbolic length function. The main emphasis is on actions of end type. For a trivial action of end type, there is no minimal invariant subtree. However, if a finitely generated group has an action of end type, the action is nontrivial and there is a unique minimal invariant subtree. There are examples of infinitely generated groups with a nontrivial action of end type for which there is no minimal invariant subtree. These results can be used to study actions of cut type.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Deroin ◽  
V. Kleptsyn ◽  
A. Navas
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enhui Shi ◽  
Suhua Wang ◽  
Lizhen Zhou
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Machunsky ◽  
Thorsten Meiser

This research investigated whether relative ingroup prototypicality (i.e., the tendency to perceive one’s own ingroup as more prototypical of a superordinate category than the outgroup) can result from a prototype-based versus exemplar-based mental representation of social categories, rather than from ingroup membership per se as previously suggested by the ingroup projection model. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a prototype-based group was perceived as more prototypical of a superordinate category than an exemplar-based group supporting the hypothesis that an intergroup context is not necessary for biased prototypicality judgments. Experiment 3 introduced an intergroup context in a minimal-group-like paradigm. The findings demonstrated that both the kind of cognitive representation and motivational processes contribute to biased prototypicality judgments in intergroup settings.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Pinter ◽  
Anthony G. Greenwald

2014 ◽  
Vol 218 (5) ◽  
pp. 777-783
Author(s):  
Darryl McCullough
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document