Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric and adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Apurva Pande ◽  
Nayan Lamba ◽  
Marco Mammi ◽  
Paulos Gebrehiwet ◽  
Alyssa Trenary ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Saekhu ◽  
Eko Suryo Pujiastono ◽  
Fabianto Santoso

Background:Using Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) or Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt (VPS) as standard technique of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion has been a debatable issue. To date, a meta-analysis on the best treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus is yet to be done. ETV has been reported to have successful outcomes in many studies. The objective of this meta-analysis is to know the effectiveness of ETV compared to VPS in pediatric hydrocephalus.Methods:This study used electronic articles published in PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar from January 1990 until January 2017. Articles included were full-text observational study or randomized control trial in Bahasa or English. Surgical failure was compared for this meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was done by using Review Manager 5.Results:Five articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pooled risk ratio (ETV vs. VPS) of surgical failure was 0.95 [0.76, 1.19] for fixed effect model. This analysis had no or little heterogeneity (I2 = 18%; X2=0.25).Conclusion:In one year follow up, there is no superiority between both procedures in surgical failure. Limited studies have been conducted to compare the effectiveness of ETV compared with VPS for pediatric hydrocephalus management. Further studies comparing both treatments are required to know the best management for pediatric hydrocephalus.Keywords: ETV, VPS, pediatric hydrocephalus, meta-analysis


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-378
Author(s):  
Yosef Ellenbogen ◽  
Karanbir Brar ◽  
Kaiyun Yang ◽  
Yung Lee ◽  
Olufemi Ajani

OBJECTIVEPediatric hydrocephalus is a significant contributor to infant morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. The mainstay of treatment has long been shunt placement for CSF diversion, but recent years have seen the rise of alternative procedures such as endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), which provides similar efficacy in selected patients. The addition of choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) to ETV has been proposed to increase efficacy, but the evidence of its utility is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of ETV+CPC in comparison to ETV alone for the treatment of pediatric all-cause hydrocephalus.METHODSMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICRCTN databases were searched from conception through to October 2018 for comparative studies including both ETV+CPC and ETV in a pediatric population. The primary outcome was success rate, defined as no secondary procedure required for CSF diversion; secondary outcomes included time to failure, mortality, and complications. Data were pooled using random-effects models of meta-analysis, and relative risk (RR) was calculated.RESULTSFive studies were included for final qualitative and quantitative analysis, including 2 prospective and 3 retrospective studies representing a total of 963 patients. Overall, there was no significant difference in success rates between ETV and ETV+CPC (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.88–1.75, p = 0.21). However, a subgroup analysis including the 4 studies focusing on African cohorts demonstrated a significant benefit of ETV+CPC (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08–1.78, p = 0.01). There were no notable differences in complication rates among studies.CONCLUSIONSThis systematic review and meta-analysis failed to find an overall benefit to the addition of CPC to ETV; however, a subgroup analysis showed efficacy in sub-Saharan African populations. This points to the need for future randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy of ETV+CPC versus ETV in varied patient populations and geographic locales.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document