High prevalence of haemosporidians in Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in Spain

2009 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mónica Fernández ◽  
Mª. Ángeles Rojo ◽  
Patricia Casanueva ◽  
Silvia Carrión ◽  
Mª. Ángeles Hernández ◽  
...  
The Condor ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Edvardsen ◽  
Arne Moksnes ◽  
Eivin Røskaft ◽  
Ingar J. Øien ◽  
Marcel Honza

AbstractThe Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) is an interspecific brood parasite that mimics the eggs of its hosts. In this study we tested the resemblance between Cuckoo and host eggs in four host species breeding in sympatry: the Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus), Great Reed Warbler (A. arundinaceus), Sedge Warbler (A. schoenobaenus), and Marsh Warbler (A. palustris). According to the “gentes theory,” individual Cuckoos lay eggs that mimic those of a single host species, and they parasitize only that species. We therefore expected the Cuckoo eggs to more closely resemble the eggs of their respective host species than eggs of sympatric hosts. However, analyses showed no such resemblance; test subjects were not able to distinguish Cuckoo eggs taken from nests of different host species. The most common Cuckoo egg type resembled the eggs of the Garden Warbler (Sylvia borin), a frequent European Cuckoo host which, however, has not been found parasitized in the study area. A possible evolutionary origin for this resemblance is discussed. Results from radio-tracking of Cuckoo females in the study area have shown that host preference does exist. This preference has not yet been manifested in the evolution of clear Cuckoo egg morphs adapted to the different host species.Imitación de Huevos por Cuculus canorus que Parasitan Cuatro Especies Simpátricas de AcrocephalusResumen. El cuco (Cuculus canorus) parasita los nidos de varias especies imitando los huevos de sus especies hospederas. En este estudio cotejamos la similitud entre los huevos de cucos y los huevos de cuatro especies hospederas que crían en simpatría: Acrocephalus scirpaceus, A. arundinaceus, A. schoenobaenus, A. palustris. De acuerdo a la “teoría de gentes” los huevos que pone un individuo de cuco imitan sólo a los huevos de una especie hospedera, y por lo tanto parasita sólo a esa especie. Debido a esto esperábamos que los huevos de cucos fueran más similares a los huevos de sus respectivas especies hospederas que a los huevos de las demás especies hospederas simpátricas. Sin embargo, los análisis no mostraron dicha similitud; los individuos testeados no fueron capaces de distinguir entre huevos de cucos tomados de nidos de diferentes especies hospederas. El tipo de huevo más común de cuco se asemeja a los huevos de Sylvia borin, una especie hospedera frecuente para los cucos europeos, la cual, sin embargo, no ha sido encontrada parasitada en el área de estudio. Se discute el posible origen evolutivo de dicha similitud. Los resultados de telemetría de hembras de cucos en el área de estudio han mostrado que la preferencia de hospedadores existe. Esta preferencia no se ha manifestado aún en la evolución del morfo claro de huevo de cuco adaptado a las diferentes especies hospederas.


Ring ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
John Morgan

Wing lengths of Clamorous Reed Warblers Acrocephalus stentoreus in Israel Wing length measurements taken from first-year, pre- and post-moulting (annual, complete) Clamorous Reed Warblers were recorded at a site in northern Israel. The resulting data set was examined using a time-series of residuals (CUSUM). Results from this analysis can explain the reported heterogeneity found in a comparable data set by Merom et al. (1999). Further observations made in their paper are rebutted: (1) an implied assumption that Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) spring migration in Israel ends by 1 May is contrary to other publications; (2) the late autumn occurence in N Israel of longer-winged 1st cal. yr. Reed Warblers, unconvincingly explained as either delayed migration by larger individuals or post fledging feather growth, is most likely due to birds from different provenances origins moving at different seasons; (3) growth during adulthood in Reed Warbler is not a new discovery, though presented as such.


Ostrich ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Ożarowska ◽  
Katarzyna Stępniewska ◽  
Wed Abdel Latif Ibrahim

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. AVILÉS ◽  
J. R. VIKAN ◽  
F. FOSSØY ◽  
A. ANTONOV ◽  
A. MOKSNES ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62
Author(s):  
Jens Hering ◽  
Elmar Fuchs ◽  
Wieland Heim ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Eilts ◽  
Peter H Barthel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deryk Tolman ◽  
Daniela Campobello ◽  
Katja Rönkä ◽  
Edward Kluen ◽  
Rose Thorogood

Hosts of brood parasitic cuckoos often employ mobbing attacks to defend their nests and, when mobbing is costly, hosts are predicted to adjust their mobbing to match parasitism risk. While evidence exists for fine-tuned plasticity, it remains unclear why mobbing does not track larger seasonal changes in parasitism risk. Here we test a possible explanation from parental investment theory: parents should defend their current brood more intensively as the opportunity to replace it declines (re-nesting potential), and therefore “counteract” any apparent seasonal decline to match parasitism risk. We take advantage of mobbing experiments conducted at two sites where reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) experience (in Italy), or do not experience (in Finland), brood parasitism. We predicted that mobbing of cuckoos should be higher overall in Italy, but remain constant over the season as in other parasitised sites, whereas in Finland where cuckoos do not pose a local threat, we predicted that mobbing should be low at the beginning of the season but increase as re-nesting potential declined. However, while cuckoos were more likely to be mobbed in Italy, we found little evidence that mobbing changed over the season at either the parasitized or non-parasitized sites. This suggests that re-nesting potential has either little influence on mobbing behavior, or that its effects are obscured by other seasonal differences in ecology or experience of hosts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document