Fibrin glue and porcine-derived mesh repair of ruptured umbilical hernia in a patient with ascites

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tong ◽  
J. Ha ◽  
H. Chandraratna
Keyword(s):  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia

scholarly journals Concomitant sublay mesh repair of umbilical hernia and abdominoplasty

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine L Mcknight ◽  
James L Fowler ◽  
William S Cobb ◽  
Dane E Smith ◽  
Alfredo M Carbonell
Keyword(s):  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Sublay Mesh

scholarly journals Outcome of sublay mesh repair in non-complicated umbilical hernia with liver cirrhosis and ascites

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Abdelaziz Hassan ◽  
Asaad Fayrouz Salama ◽  
Hussam Hamdy ◽  
Magdy Mohamed Elsebae ◽  
Ayman Mohamed Abdelaziz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Sublay Mesh

scholarly journals Retro rectus mesh repair for umbilical hernia in adults: a study of 50 cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Ketan Vagholkar
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Open Technique ◽  
Surgical Practice ◽  
Local Complications ◽  
Onlay Mesh

Background: Umbilical hernia is one of the most commonly encountered hernia in surgical practice. A variety of repairs have been tried our ranging from open to laparoscopic. However controversy still persists as to which type of repair is the gold standard for umbilical hernia. Open technique comprises of the onlay mesh repair which is known to develop a variety of complications. Even laparoscopic approach also has failure rates as well as local complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of open retro rectus mesh repair for adult umbilical hernias.Methods: 50 consecutive cases of umbilical hernia were repaired by open technique with retro rectus placement of mesh.Results: There were no local complications or any recurrence in any of the fifty patients.Conclusions: Retro rectus placement of mesh in open repair of umbilical hernia in adults is a safe and effective modality of treatment. 

scholarly journals Lower Risk of Recurrence After Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Sutured Repair in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bisgaard ◽  
R. Kaufmann ◽  
M. W. Christoffersen ◽  
P. Strandfelt ◽  
L. L. Gluud
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Seroma Formation ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background and Aims: The use of mesh repair in a small- or middle-sized umbilical hernia remains controversial, and evidence is based on only few and small heterogeneous randomized trials. The primary aim was to assess differences, if any, in recurrence (clinical and reoperation), and secondary aim was to assess differences in infections, seroma formation, hematomas, chronic pain, cosmetic result, and quality of life. Method: A systematic review (predefined search strategy) and meta-analyses were conducted based on pre-study strict and well-defined methodology. The literature search was completed on 1 January 2018. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Results: Five randomized controlled trials were identified (mesh repair, n = 326 versus non-mesh sutured repair, n = 330) and 602 records were excluded. Randomized controlled trials included patients with defect diameters of ⩾1 to 4 cm. Mesh repair reduced the risk of recurrence compared with sutured repair with a relative risk of 0.28 (95% confidence interval = 0.13–0.58, I2 = 0%, number needed to treat = 13 patients). Additional analyses found no differences between the two surgical techniques regarding infection (relative risk = 0.80, 95% confidence interval = 0.36–1.79), seroma formation (relative risk = 1.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.57–3.32), or hematomas (relative risk = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = 0.23–1.30). Lack of sufficient data precluded meta-analysis evaluating risk of seroma formation, hematomas, chronic pain, cosmetic result, and quality of life. Conclusion: Mesh repair is recommended for umbilical hernia of ⩾1 to 4 cm. More evidence is needed for the optimal placement of the mesh (sublay or onlay) and the role of mesh in patients with an umbilical hernia <1 cm.

scholarly journals To mesh or not to mesh? A five year retrospective study evaluating patient perspective of mesh and non-mesh repair of umbilical and para-umbilical hernia

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S99
Author(s):  
Matthew Arneill ◽  
Matthew Tyson ◽  
Holly Pridham-Young ◽  
Evelin Jones ◽  
Emma Tyson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Patient Perspective

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Onlay and Preperitoneal Mesh Repair in Management of Umbilical and Para-Umbilical Hernia

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 475-480
Author(s):  
Manish Jagtap ◽  
◽  
Suresh R Harbade ◽  
Sarojini P Jadhav ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia

scholarly journals Novel Technique Combining Tissue and Mesh Repair for Umbilical Hernia in Adults

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (09) ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
Ketan Vagholkar ◽  
Suvarna Vagholkar
Keyword(s):  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Novel Technique
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document