Current status of radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer in Japan, based on the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan from 2009 to 2011 by the Japan Esophageal Society

Esophagus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Toh ◽  
Hodaka Numasaki ◽  
Yuji Tachimori ◽  
Takashi Uno ◽  
Keiichi Jingu ◽  
...  
Esophagus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Nemoto ◽  
Shohei Kawashiro ◽  
Yasushi Toh ◽  
Hodaka Numasaki ◽  
Yuji Tachimori ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) for esophageal cancer, a radiotherapy (RT) dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions has been the standard in many countries, while 60 Gy in 30 fractions has been frequently used in Japan. To clarify the optimal RT dose in CRTx for esophageal cancer, we compared clinical outcomes with the two doses using data from the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan by the Japan Esophageal Society (JES). Methods Of the patients enrolled in the registry for 2015–2017 surveys (patients treated between 2009 and 2011), 996 patients who received definitive CRTx with 50.4 Gy or 60 Gy for thoracic esophageal cancer were eligible for analysis. Results The complete response (CR) rates in the 50.4 Gy and 60 Gy groups were 49.1% and 46.4%, respectively (p = 0.5851). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the 50.4 Gy group and 60 Gy group for stages I, II/III and IV were 64.2% and 57.2%, 35.0% and 27.0%, and 18.0% and 15.3%, respectively. Since no significant difference was found between the two groups, the 50.4 Gy group was not inferior to the 60 Gy group with regard to OS. Conclusions The analysis revealed that the 50.4 Gy group had a non-inferior outcome in comparison with the 60 Gy group for stages I, II/III and IV thoracic esophageal cancer. These results were obtained from a large database for the first time in Japan.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
Yasunori Akutsu ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Hiroyasu Igaki ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Isao Nozaki ◽  
...  

10 Background: Recently, a limited operation to avoid needless lymph node (LN) dissection in clinical T1bN0 esophageal cancer (EC) is considered. However, how LN dissection or radiation field should be decided for such cases has not yet been clarified. The information about prevalence of LN metastases (LNMs) would be valuable when the radiation field and extent of LN dissection are considered in the treatment of T1bN0 EC. Methods: JCOG0502 is a randomized controlled trial including a patient preference arm comparing surgery alone to definitive chemoradiotherapy in clinical T1bN0 EC. By using baseline clinical and pathological data of JCOG0502, diagnosis accuracy of LNM was evaluated by comparing clinical and pathologic findings. Then, the sites of pathologic LNMs were determined and the initial sites and the prevalence of LNM were estimated. Results: Between Dec 2006 and Feb 2013, 213 patients (pts) enrolled to the surgery arm in JCOG0502. Pts with multiple lesions or without esophagectomy were excluded and remaining 186 pts were analyzed. Of the 186 pts of clinical T1bN0, 137 pts were diagnosed as LNM negative (73.7%: accuracy of diagnosis), however, 49 pts (26.3%) had pathologic LNMs. Pathologic LNMs were seen at 106recR, 106recL (all in mediastinal region) in upper thoracic (Ut) EC, 101R, 101L, 104R, 104L (in the neck region), 106recR, 106recL, 106tbL, 105, 107, 108, 109L, 110 (in the mediastinal region), 1,2,3,7, 11 (in the abdominal region) in middle thoracic (Mt) EC, and 105, 106recL, 110 (in the mediastinal region), 1, 2, 3, 7 (in the abdominal region) in lower thoracic (Lt) EC, respectively. Of the 49 pts who had pathologic LNMs, 32 pts (65%) were of pathologically N2 or more. Furthermore, 18 pts (37%) had skip LNM (LNM of N2, N3 or N4 without N1). The solitary pathologic LNM was observed in 25 pts: N1 (106recR, 106recL) in Ut, N1 (106recR, 106recL, 108), N2 (101R, 105, 110, 1, 3, 7), in Mt, N1(110, 1), N2 (106recL, 3, 7) in Lt, respectively. Conclusions: In the current status of clinical diagnosis, limited LN dissection or limited field of radiation are not recommended. In surgery, D2 LN dissection is necessary and three-field LN dissection is recommended especially in middle thoracic EC even for clinical T1bN0. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000551.


2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-113
Author(s):  
E. Nagai ◽  
K. Nakata ◽  
K. Ohuchida ◽  
R. Maeyama ◽  
S. Shimizu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-213
Author(s):  
M. Yano ◽  
K. Takachi ◽  
K. Kishi ◽  
I. Miyashiro ◽  
S. Noura ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 998-1001
Author(s):  
Cai-yun ZHANG ◽  
Shi-cai CHEN ◽  
Hong-liang ZHENG ◽  
Zhi-gang LI ◽  
Min-hui ZHU ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chang ◽  
Wei Deng ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Zongmei Zhou ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To investigate the interobserver variability (IOV) in target volume delineation of definitive radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) among cancer centers in China, and ultimately improve contouring consistency as much as possible to lay the foundation for multi-center prospective studies. Methods Sixteen cancer centers throughout China participated in this study. In Phase 1, three suitable cases with upper, middle, and lower TEC were chosen, and participants were asked to contour a group of gross tumor volume (GTV-T), nodal gross tumor volume (GTV-N) and clinical target volume (CTV) for each case based on their routine experience. In Phase 2, the same clinicians were instructed to follow a contouring protocol to re-contour another group of target volume. The variation of the target volume was analyzed and quantified using dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results Sixteen clinicians provided routine volumes, whereas ten provided both routine and protocol volumes for each case. The IOV of routine GTV-N was the most striking in all cases, with the smallest DSC of 0.37 (95% CI 0.32–0.42), followed by CTV, whereas GTV-T showed high consistency. After following the protocol, the smallest DSC of GTV-N was improved to 0.64 (95% CI 0.45–0.83, P = 0.005) but the DSC of GTV-T and CTV remained constant in most cases. Conclusion Variability in target volume delineation was observed, but it could be significantly reduced and controlled using mandatory interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document