Differences in upper esophageal sphincter function and clinical characteristics among the three subtypes of Japanese patients with esophageal achalasia

Esophagus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Katsumata ◽  
Noriaki Manabe ◽  
Maki Ayaki ◽  
Minoru Fujita ◽  
Jun Nakamura ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 267 (4) ◽  
pp. G644-G649 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. N. Ali ◽  
T. M. Laundl ◽  
K. L. Wallace ◽  
D. W. Shaw ◽  
D. J. Decarle ◽  
...  

The potential influence of mucosal sensory receptors on the regulation of oral-pharyngeal swallow events was studied in 15 healthy volunteers using simultaneous videoradiography and manometry. We determined the effects of selective pharyngeal and oral plus pharyngeal anesthesia on the following temporal and manometric measures in response to liquid and viscous swallows: regional transit and clearance times; motion of hyoid and larynx; upper esophageal sphincter relaxation, opening, and closure; and pharyngeal contraction wave characteristics. Under the influence of mucosal anesthesia no subjects demonstrated aspiration during deglutition. Neither regional transit and clearance times nor pharyngosphincteric coordination was influenced significantly by pharyngeal mucosal anesthesia or oral plus pharyngeal anesthesia. Although midpharyngeal and distal pharyngeal contraction amplitudes were not influenced by mucosal anesthesia, midpharyngeal contraction wave duration was reduced significantly by both pharyngeal (P = 0.02) and oral plus pharyngeal anesthesia (P = 0.0005). We conclude that 1) neither elicitation of the pharyngeal swallow response nor temporal regulation among swallow events is dependent on mucosal sensory receptors and 2) duration of the pharyngeal contraction is influenced by sensory input from the oral-pharyngeal mucosa.


1995 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 1328-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galib N Ali ◽  
David R Hunt ◽  
John O Jorgensen ◽  
David J DeCarle ◽  
Ian J Cook

Dysphagia ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Frieling ◽  
W. Berges ◽  
H. J. Lübke ◽  
P. Enck ◽  
M. Wienbeck

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (2) ◽  
pp. G262-G267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Torrico ◽  
Mark Kern ◽  
Muhammad Aslam ◽  
Subashini Narayanan ◽  
Ananda Kannappan ◽  
...  

Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function during gastroesophageal reflux events is not completely elucidated because previous studies addressing this issue yielded conflicting results. We reexamined the UES pressure response to intraluminal esophageal pressure and pH changes induced by reflux events. We studied 14 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers (age 49 ± 6 yr) and 7 gastroesophageal reflux disease patients (age 48 ± 5 yr). UES pressure, intraesophageal pressure, and pH were monitored at the distal, middle, and proximal esophagus concurrently in the supine position 1 h before and 2 h after a 1,000-calorie meal. A total of 321 reflux events were identified by the development of abrupt reflux-induced intraesophageal pressure increase (IPI); 285 events occurred in patients and 36 in control subjects. In control subjects 33 of 36 and in patients 252 of 285 IPI events were associated with a pH drop. Among patients and control subjects, 99% and 100%, respectively, of all IPI events irrespective of pH drop were associated with abrupt increase in UES pressure (34 ± 2 and 27 ± 6 mmHg, respectively). The average percentage of maximum UES pressure increase over prereflux values ranged between 66% and 96% (control subjects) and 34% and 122% (patients). IPIs induced by both acidic and nonacidic reflux events evoke strong UES contractile responses.


1988 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J. Kahrilas ◽  
W.J. Dodds ◽  
J. Dent ◽  
J.A. Logemann ◽  
R. Shaker

1980 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 446-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Reichert ◽  
Kenneth D. Faw

The cricopharyngeus muscle in neonates and infants has not been well established. It is found, like other laryngopharyngeal structures in infants, to be relatively much larger than its counterpart in the adult but not large enough to correlate with the total length of reported sphincter function. It also varies significantly in size, and therefore probably does not contribute completely to the function of the upper esophageal sphincter. Its relationship to airway protection, regurgitation and respiration needs to be more thoroughly studied.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiro Karaho ◽  
Junko Nakajima ◽  
Tetsuya Satoh ◽  
Keisuke Kawahara ◽  
Takeshi Nakayama ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 699-703
Author(s):  
Taigo TOKUHARA ◽  
Masayuki HIGASHINO ◽  
Harushi OSUGI ◽  
Mitsuo HAI ◽  
Noriaki MAEKAWA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document