scholarly journals A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery: part 2—laparoscopic port instruments, trocar site closure, and electrosurgical techniques

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire F. la Chapelle ◽  
◽  
Willem A. Bemelman ◽  
Marlies Y. Bongers ◽  
Teus A. van Barneveld ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire F. la Chapelle ◽  
◽  
Willem A. Bemelman ◽  
Bart M. P. Rademaker ◽  
Teus A. van Barneveld ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 386-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Ibrahim ◽  
S Alazzawi ◽  
I Nizam ◽  
FS Haddad

Introduction Total knee replacement (TKR) is a very common surgical procedure. Improved pain management techniques, surgical practices and the introduction of novel interventions have enhanced the patient’s postoperative experience after TKR. Safe, efficient pathways are needed to address the increasing need for knee arthroplasty in the UK. Enhanced recovery programmes can help to reduce hospital stays following knee replacements while maintaining patient safety and satisfaction. This review outlines common evidence-based pre, intra and postoperative interventions in use in enhanced recovery protocols following TKR. Methods A thorough literature search of the electronic healthcare databases (MEDLINE®, Embase™ and the Cochrane Library) was conducted to identify articles and studies concerned with enhanced recovery and fast track pathways for TKR. Results A literature review revealed several non-operative and operative interventions that are effective in enhanced recovery following TKR including preoperative patient education, pre-emptive and local infiltration analgesia, preoperative nutrition, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic fields, perioperative rehabilitation, modern wound dressings, different standard surgical techniques, minimally invasive surgery and computer assisted surgery. Conclusions Enhanced recovery programmes require a multidisciplinary team of dedicated professionals, principally involving preoperative education, multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation; this will be boosted if combined with minimally invasive surgery. The current economic climate and restricted healthcare budget further necessitate brief hospitalisation while minimising costs. These non-operative interventions are the way forward to achieve such requirements.


2017 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Yang ◽  
Daniel Pepe ◽  
Christopher M Schlachta ◽  
Nawar A Alkhamesi

Preoperative endoscopic tattoo is becoming more important with the advent of minimally invasive surgery. Current practices are variable and are operator-dependent. There are no evidence-based guidelines to aid endoscopists in clinical practice. Furthermore, there are still a number of issues with endoscopic tattoo including poor intraoperative visualisation, complications from tattooing and inaccurate documentation leading to the need for intraoperative endoscopy, prolonged operative time and reoperation due to lack of oncologic resection. This review aims to collate and summarise evidence for the best practice of endoscopic tattoo for colorectal lesions in order to provide guidance for endoscopists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document