Are multiple choice tests fair to medical students with specific learning disabilities?

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ricketts ◽  
Julie Brice ◽  
Lee Coombes
2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Rafaelo Schlinkert ◽  
Sandro Scarpelini ◽  
Antonio Pazin-Filho

BACKGROUND: E-learning techniques are spreading at great speed in medicine, raising concerns about the impact of adopting them. Websites especially designed to host courses are becoming more common. There is a lack of evidence that these systems could enhance student knowledge acquisition. GOAL: To evaluate the impact of using dedicated-website tools over cognition of medical students exposed to a first-aid course. METHODS: Prospective study of 184 medical students exposed to a twenty-hour first-aid course. We generated a dedicated-website with several sections (lectures, additional reading material, video and multiple choice exercises). We constructed variables expressing the student's access to each section. The evaluation was composed of fifty multiple-choice tests, based on clinical problems. We used multiple linear regression to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: There was no association of website intensity of exposure and the outcome - beta-coeficient 0.27 (95%CI - 0.454 - 1.004). These findings were not altered after adjustment for potential confounders - 0.165 (95%CI -0.628 - 0.960). CONCLUSION: A dedicated website with passive and active capabilities for aiding in person learning had not shown association with a better outcome.


1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brown Grier ◽  
Raymond Ditrichs

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeri L. Little ◽  
Elizabeth Ligon Bjork ◽  
Ashley Kees

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document