scholarly journals Are breast conservation and mastectomy equally effective in the treatment of young women with early breast cancer? Long-term results of a population-based cohort of 1,451 patients aged ≤40 years

2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice J. C. van der Sangen ◽  
Fenneke M. M. van de Wiel ◽  
Philip M. P. Poortmans ◽  
Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen ◽  
Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Won Jeon ◽  
Jung Eun Choi ◽  
Heung Kyu Park ◽  
Ku Sang Kim ◽  
Jee Yeon Lee ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey M. Greenberg

Background Radiation therapy is a key component of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. There is great interest in safety and long-term outcome issues for this still underutilized approach. Methods The author reviews a series of factors that may affect the end results of conservation therapy and highlights those that are likely to be of clinical significance. Results Daily dose fractions are usually less than 2 Gy and a homogeneous whole-breast dose is used. Care is needed with patients with collagen vascular diseases, large breasts, breast trauma, and prior infections, but these factors are not absolute contraindications to breast conservation therapy. Acute skin reactions are not predictive of long-term complications. Conclusions With adherence to proper surgical and radiation techniques, most patients presenting with localized breast cancer can be managed safely and effectively with breast conservation.


The Breast ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice J.C. van der Sangen ◽  
Sanne W.M. Scheepers ◽  
Philip M.P. Poortmans ◽  
Ernest J.T. Luiten ◽  
Grard A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
A. Boukerche ◽  
C. Bechekat ◽  
A. Yahia ◽  
R. Madouri ◽  
M. Cherigane ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 223 (6) ◽  
pp. 709-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T. Neff ◽  
Harry D. Bear ◽  
Catherine V. Pierce ◽  
Margaret M. Grimes ◽  
Martin D. Fleming ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (35) ◽  
pp. 4175-4183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Icro Meattini ◽  
Livia Marrazzo ◽  
Calogero Saieva ◽  
Isacco Desideri ◽  
Vieri Scotti ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To report the long-term results of external-beam accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) Florence phase III trial comparing whole-breast irradiation (WBI) to APBI in early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The primary end point was to determine the 5-year difference in ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) between 30 Gy in 5 once-daily fractions (APBI arm) and 50 Gy in 25 fractions with a tumor bed boost (WBI arm) after breast-conserving surgery. RESULTS Five hundred twenty patients, more than 90% of whom had characteristics associated with low recurrence risk, were randomly assigned (WBI, n = 260; APBI, n = 260) between 2005 and 2013. Median follow-up was 10.7 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of IBTR was 2.5% (n = 6) in the WBI and 3.7% (n = 9) in the APBI arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% CI, 0.55 to 4.37; P = .40). Overall survival at 10 years was 91.9% in both arms (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.79; P = .86). Breast cancer–specific survival at 10 years was 96.7% in the WBI and 97.8% in the APBI arm (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.99; P = .45). The APBI arm showed significantly less acute toxicity ( P = .0001) and late toxicity ( P = .0001) and improved cosmetic outcome as evaluated by both physician ( P = .0001) and patient ( P = .0001). CONCLUSION The 10-year cumulative IBTR incidence in early breast cancer treated with external APBI using IMRT technique in 5 once-daily fractions is low and not different from that after WBI. Acute and late treatment-related toxicity and cosmesis outcomes were significantly in favor of APBI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document