Analysis of Thermodynamic Efficiency of Small-Scale Natural Gas Liquefying Plant Operating on Medium-Pressure Cycle

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 656-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Arkharov ◽  
V. Yu. Semenov
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (59) ◽  
pp. 34483-34493
Author(s):  
Hua Liu ◽  
Jinghui Qu ◽  
Ming Pan ◽  
Bingjian Zhang ◽  
Qinglin Chen ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lozza ◽  
P. Chiesa

This paper discusses novel schemes of combined cycle, where natural gas is chemically treated to remove carbon, rather than being directly used as fuel. Carbon conversion to CO2 is achieved before gas turbine combustion. The first part of the paper discussed plant configurations based on natural gas partial oxidation to produce carbon monoxide, converted to carbon dioxide by shift reaction and therefore separated from the fuel gas. The second part will address methane reforming as a starting reaction to achieve the same goal. Plant configuration and performance differs from the previous case because reforming is endothermic and requires high temperature heat and low operating pressure to obtain an elevated carbon conversion. The performance estimation shows that the reformer configuration has a lower efficiency and power output than the systems addressed in Part I. To improve the results, a reheat gas turbine can be used, with different characteristics from commercial machines. The thermodynamic efficiency of the systems of the two papers is compared by an exergetic analysis. The economic performance of natural gas fired power plants including CO2 sequestration is therefore addressed, finding a superiority of the partial oxidation system with chemical absorption. The additional cost of the kWh, due to the ability of CO2 capturing, can be estimated at about 13–14 mill$/kWh.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. S. Yin ◽  
H. Y. Li ◽  
Q. H. Fan ◽  
L. X. Jia ◽  
J. G. Weisend ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 391-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Tcvetkov ◽  
Alexey Cherepovitsyn ◽  
Alexey Makhovikov

Author(s):  
Griffin Beck ◽  
David Ransom ◽  
Kevin Hoopes

Abstract Natural gas production has increased dramatically in recent years due to advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques. There are still challenges that must be addressed by industry to better utilize these abundant natural gas resources. For example, due to the cost and complexity with piping installations from remote well sites to processing facilities (should they exist), natural gas is often flared at the site whereas the liquid hydrocarbons are stored in holding tanks. For the natural gas that is recovered and processed, there are currently economic benefits to exporting the gas to international markets, provided that the gas can be liquefied and shipped. While the number of liquefaction facilities has increased in recent years, additional liquefaction plants are needed. This paper introduces a novel liquefaction cycle that utilizes a supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) power cycle to provide power and initial stages of refrigeration to a natural gas liquefaction cycle. The liquefaction cycle uses a flow of CO2 extracted from the power cycle as well as natural gas to provide several stages of refrigeration capable of liquefying the process stream. The combined sCO2 power and liquefaction cycle is described in detail and initial cycle analyses are presented. The cycle performance is compared to small-scale natural gas liquefaction cycles and is shown to provide comparable performance to the reviewed cycles. Due to the compact nature of the sCO2 power cycle equipment, the sCO2 liquefaction cycle described herein can provide small, modular liquefaction plants that can be employed at individual well sites to liquefy and store the natural gas as opposed to flaring the gas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document