The Stern Review debate: an editorial essay

2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 241-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Stern Review ◽  
Editorial Essay

scholarly journals The Stern Review and the economics of climate change: an editorial essay

2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Yohe ◽  
Richard S. J. Tol
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Stern Review ◽  
Editorial Essay

scholarly journals Beyond the Stern Review: Lessons from a risky venture at the limits of the cost–benefit analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 2479-2484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Hourcade ◽  
Philippe Ambrosi ◽  
Patrice Dumas
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stern Review ◽  
The Cost

Stern and his critics on discounting and climate change: an editorial essay

2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 195-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Quiggin
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Editorial Essay

Editorial Essay

ILR Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel C. Avgar ◽  
Adrienne E. Eaton ◽  
Rebecca Kolins Givan ◽  
Adam Seth Litwin
Keyword(s):  
Editorial Essay

scholarly journals The Real-Time REF Review: A Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility of a Longitudinal Evaluation of Perceptions and Attitudes Towards REF 2021

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Netta Weinstein ◽  
James Wilsdon ◽  
Jennifer Chubb ◽  
Geoff Haddock
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Research Assessment ◽  
Research Assessment Exercise ◽  
Perceptions And Attitudes ◽  
Education Community ◽  
Stern Review ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The University ◽  
Uk Higher Education

The UK first introduced a national research assessment exercise in 1986, and methods of assessment continue to evolve. Following the 2016 Stern Review and further rounds of technical consultation, the UK higher education community is now preparing for the next Research Excellence Framework – REF 2021.Despite its importance in shaping UK research cultures, there is limited systematic and nuanced evidence about how academics across the sector view the REF, and which aspects are viewed favourably or unfavourably. The aims of this pilot study were twofold: first, it was designed to gather initial data to address this evidence gap; second, it was aimed at testing the feasibility of conducting a longitudinal study into academic and managerial attitudes towards the REF. We argue that further research to better understand the effects of the REF on research cultures, institutions, and individuals should be part of the evidence used to inform the development of future iterations of the exerciseThe Real Time REF Review Pilot Study was developed and delivered by a research team from Cardiff University and the University of Sheffield, in collaboration with Research England.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document